Thursday, May 26, 2005
Monday, May 23, 2005
At the World Economic Forum conference in Jordan on Saturday, Republican members of the U.S. Congressional delegation were very direct in letting Arab leaders know that the U.S. support of Israel is unwavering.
According to press reports, Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) said the peace process aimed at bringing about an independent Palestinian state is unlikely to win serious backing from the Bush administration without a demonstration of commitment from both sides.
"Until we have someone on the other side who is willing to say 'Yes,' we're not going to continue to prostitute the American presidency to people who aren't serious," said Smith. "It's a mystery to me why Arab countries can't work on their own countries before Palestine is fixed," he added.
"Obviously one of the greatest commitments that we have is to the Jewish people and the state of Israel, to try and manage the difficult process of the peace there and securing that nation, and doing so in a way that, if possible, is just to the Palestinians," Smith told a panel that included Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa, top officials from Jordan, the Palestinian territories, Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as academics from Iran and Turkey.
Asked why the United States was willing to anger Arab countries in favor of Israel, another Congressman, Rep. Christopher Shays, said simply that America is not a neutral player in the Middle East.
"We are Israel's strong ally," Shays, Republican of Connecticut, said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It would be foolish for people to think that somehow we are neutral."
Compiled from reports filed by the Associated Press and the Jerusalem Post.
Bush Country - a must-read! (excerpt)
Monday, May 23, 2005 By: Fouad Ajami
"George W. Bush has unleashed a tsunami on this region," a shrewd Kuwaiti merchant who knows the way of his world said to me. The man had no patience with the standard refrain that Arab reform had to come from within, that a foreign power cannot alter the age-old ways of the Arabs. "Everything here--the borders of these states, the oil explorations that remade the life of this world, the political outcomes that favored the elites now in the saddle--came from the outside. This moment of possibility for the Arabs is no exception." A Jordanian of deep political experience at the highest reaches of Arab political life had no doubt as to why history suddenly broke in Lebanon, and could conceivably change in Syria itself before long. "The people in the streets of Beirut knew that no second Hama is possible; they knew that the rulers were under the gaze of American power, and knew that Bush would not permit a massive crackdown by the men in Damascus."
My informant's reference to Hama was telling: It had been there in 1982, in that city of the Syrian interior, that the Baathist-Alawite regime had broken and overwhelmed Syrian society...
CLICK ON THE POST TITLE TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE THAT YOU WILL NOT FIND IN THE MAINSTREAM PRESS SUCH AS THE NEW YORK TIMES.
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
On the issue of stem cell research, I must honestly tell you that I am firmly AGAINST "Embryonic Stem Cell Research" Any kind of research that requires the use of cells harvested from human embryos is to me considered murderous and inhuman. Human embryos are meant to be living, breathing human beings, not replacements for lab rats!
Use of stem cells from other sources, such as those harvested from an umbylical cord of a baby that was from a live delivery and donated by the parents of that child, then I'm all for it, and even adult stem cells.
Research on adult stem cells has recently generated a great deal of excitement. Scientists have found adult stem cells in many more tissues than they once thought possible. This finding has led scientists to ask whether adult stem cells could be used for transplants. In fact, adult blood forming stem cells from bone marrow have been used in transplants for 30 years. Certain kinds of adult stem cells seem to have the ability to differentiate into a number of different cell types, given the right conditions. If this differentiation of adult stem cells can be controlled in the laboratory, these cells may become the basis of therapies for many serious common diseases.
Other then advancing the agenda of death and abortion, that the wacko liberal socialist Democrats love so much, I see no other reason to pursue this research that turns humans into research animals.
It often disturbs me how the enviromentalist tree hugging freaks of nature that support the Marxists like Democrats, are pro life when it comes to animals and trees, but become rabid animals in their support for the killing of human babies on demand.
The enviromental facists of this country are in bed with the G-dless faces of the Marxist like Democratic Party. Take away G-d so that they can advance their agenda of living without morals, and laws thus trying to make themselves, "G-d like".
Research involving Human lives......The Rogue Jew says, "HELL NO!"
DO WE WANT ANOTHER 8 YEARS OF SCANDAL AND
TERROR INSECURITY IN OUR NATION? I PRAY NOT!
THE ONLY WAY I EVER WANT HITLARY TO EVER SEE
THE INSIDE OF THE WHITEHOUSE AGAIN, IS AS A PAYING
TOURIST! SEND A MESSAGE TO THE FORMER FIRST FELON
AND TELL HER AND BJ BILL "HELL NO!" IN 2008.
THE ROGUE JEW
What kind of civilized people call for the destruction of an entire nation? What value on life do you have when you call for payment in the form of a person's blood?
It was reported in this former industrial town north of London, a small group of young Britons whose parents emigrated from Pakistan after World War II have turned against their families' new home. They say they would like to see Prime Minister Tony Blair dead or deposed and an Islamic flag hanging outside No. 10 Downing Street.
They swear allegiance to Osama bin Laden and his goal of toppling Western democracies to establish an Islamic superstate under Shariah law, like Afghanistan under the Taliban. They call the Sept. 11 hijackers the "Magnificent 19" and regard the Madrid train bombings as a clever way to drive a wedge into Europe.
In Slough, Sheik Omar spends much of his time regaling his young followers with the erotic delights of paradise — sweet kisses and the pleasures of bathing with scores of women — while he also preached the virtues of death in Islamic struggle as a ticket to paradise.
He spoke of terrorism as the new norm of cultural conflict, "the fashion of the 21st century," practiced as much by Tony Blair as by Al Qaeda.
"We may be caught up in the target as the people of Manhattan were," he told them.
And he warned Western leaders, "You may kill bin Laden, but the phenomenon, you cannot kill it — you cannot destroy it."
"Our Muslim brothers from abroad will come one day and conquer here and then we will live under Islam in dignity," he said.
These monsters....YES, I SAID MONSTERS! Want to inflict their prehistoric way of life on us here in America. Their notion of a good life is living in some g-d forsaken cave and killing ones self so that you can enjoy 72 virgins in heaven...I could be wrong, but 72 virgins in a country like Syria usually consists of ugly sheep!
The only way we will win this war against these schmucks is to bomb them into oblivion. If they ever attack us again, I think that the United States Military, G-d Bless our boys and girls, should turn Mecca into a smoking pile of rubble. Hit the bastards where they live!
They desecrate Jewish and Christian icons every day, yet these "civililized" religious zealots, RIOT when a Q'uaran is supposedly flushed down a toilet.
If I were Tony Blair, I would have these clerics arrested, tried for treason and EXECUTED! Then bury the bastards inside of the belly of a dead pig! Same goes if a Islamofacist cleric ever makes a speech here in the United States calling for Jihad and the death of our president. Arrest them, try them in a military court and you KILL THEM! If you want to defeat these animals, then you have to get down in the mud and play by their rules.
That is just my opinion...I could be wrong, but I doubt it......The Rogue Jew
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
A reporter at NewsMax.com has learned that a new book about Hillary Clinton is being rushed into print months ahead of schedule and Vanity Fair magazine will soon publish an excerpt of the work.
Publishing insiders say the book and its revelations could destroy her bid to run for the presidency in 2008.
The tell-all book by Edward Klein, "The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President," was originally slated for publication in September.
Click on post title to read this article from NewMax.com!
Monday, May 23, 2005
This yutz is really over the top when he declares that Tom Delay should be sitting in a jail cell in the state of Texas, but in the same breath DEFENDS Osama bin Laden.
Asked by NBC host Tim Russert if his rhetoric toward DeLay wasn't hypocritical given his comments during the 2004 presidential campaign, where Dean said he didn't want to prejudge even Osama bin Laden, the top Democrat told Russert: "To be honest with you, Tim, I don't think I'm prejudging him."
"So you will not retract or apologize your comments about Tom DeLay?" asked Russert.
"Absolutely not," said Dean.
Dean was asked about his recent comments characterizing Republicans as "evil." He explained that the party has told the American people lies.
Asked to talk about those lies, Dean said: "Such as the weapons of mass destruction, which we have all known about, but the ... "
"Well, you said there were weapons of mass destruction," said Russert.
"I said I wasn't sure, but I said I thought there probably were," Dean explained. "But the thing that really bothered me the most, which the 9-11 Commission said also wasn't true, is the insinuation that the president continues to make to this day that Osama bin Laden had something to do with supporting terrorists that attacked the United States. That is false. The 9-11 Commission, chaired by a Republican, said it was false. Is it wrong to send people to war without telling them the truth. And the truth was Osama bin Laden was a very bad person who was doing terrible things, but that Iraq was never a threat to the United States. That was the truth. It was underlined by the 9-11 Commission, headed, again, by a Republican, a well-respected group of people. I don't think you send American men and women to war, first of all without properly equipping them, and secondly without telling the truth to their parents about why it is we're asking them to make that sacrifice. So those are the kinds of things that I think are very bad about the Republicans."
Personally, I feel that Howard Dean as the leader of the DNC, is the best thing that could ever happen to the Republicans and the Conservative agenda. I don't think you get any further left then Howard Dean and his co-concipiritors Ted "hic" Kennedy and John F. Kerry. They are trying to head off an attack by the former President Bill "Blow Job" Clinton and his first felon wife, Sen. Hitlary Clinton to try to make it appear that they are steering the party to the moderate center. But as any educated person would be able to tell that they're is nothing moderate about the Clintons. They are as socialist as they come. They just are not up front and honest about it like Dean and Co. are. But then again, when have we ever known the Clintons to be honest about anything, ever in their lives or careers.
Sunday, May 22, 2005
"Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now." - Talking Ann Coulter doll, Conservative Book Service
"We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. ¶ We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war." - from her syndicated column 13 September, 2001
On the values of Christianity vs. the values of Islam:
"Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed')". - from her column (at townhall.com) 4 March, 2004
"I think [women] should be armed but should not vote...women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it...it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care." - Politically Incorrect, February 26, 2001
"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted." - May 17, 2003.
"Like the Democrats, Playboy just wants to liberate women to behave like pigs, have sex without consequences, prance about naked, and abort children." - How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), 2004
On a pie throwing incident against her in October, 2004
"A couple [of] alleged males attempted to sucker punch a 100-pound woman and missed. And they ended up with their faces smashed in and spending the night in the w:Pima County Jail, where I'm sure -- being good liberals -- their views on gay marriage will serve them well." from w:The Sean Hannity Show, October 22, 2004.
I LOVE ANN COULTER. LATER THIS WEEK, I WILL DISCUSS STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION.....THE ROGUE JEW
Thursday, May 19, 2005
By Robert H. Knight
Kinsey’s 10% figure has created a false "minority" group in the public mind
Franklin Kameny of Washington, D.C., is often described as the "dean" of homosexual activists. Mr. Kameny claims to have coined the term "gay is good," and was instrumental in having D.C.’s sodomy law repealed.
Recently, he made an amazing statement regarding one of the totems of the sexual revolution, the claim that one in every 10 people is "gay." Here’s his quote, from a letter in the September 6, 2002, Washington Blade:
"I personally created the ‘10 percent figure’ in late 1960 for use in my position to the U.S. Supreme Court, in my own case. The figure was based upon a reasonable and plausible, intentionally conservative and understated interpretation of the Kinsey data, which were the only statistics then available.
"The 10 percent figure subsequently achieved a life of its own, and was universally accepted and used. Whatever its initial accuracy, I am convinced it is much closer to reality than the ridiculously low figure of 1 or 2 percent, derived from highly questionable and unreliable research."
Mr. Kameny is right about the way the 10 percent myth was used. Journalists, lawyers and educators began citing it without a hint of skepticism. The result was the creation in the public mind of a false "minority" group that began to co-opt the moral capital of the civil rights movement. It didn’t matter that it was all based on bad science.
Alfred C. Kinsey’s research, which helped launch the sexual revolution, was utterly exposed in Dr. Judith Reisman’s and Edward Eichel’s 1990 book Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People (Huntington House-Lochinvar). The British medical journal Lancet said the authors "demolish the two [Kinsey] reports."
Kinsey deliberately weighted his samples with homosexuals, convicted criminals and other unorthodox subjects. The authors also expose how Kinsey used children in sex studies to concoct a theory of "child sexuality" that is the guiding force today behind sex education curricula promoted by Planned Parenthood and the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).
Studies published by the University of Chicago, Family Planning Perspectives, the British Medical Journal, the National Health Interview Survey of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, and many others indicate an incidence of homosexuality of 1 to 2 percent in Western countries.
Although the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Science, initially supported the Kinsey research in the late 1940s and early 1950s, a reassessment emerged in 1989. Here is an excerpt from AIDS: Sexual Behavior and Intravenous Drug Use, edited by Charles F. Turner, Heather G. Miller, and Lincoln E. Moses (National Academy Press, National Research Council, 1989), p. 82:
"It has long been recognized that one of the greatest faults of the Kinsey research was the way in which the cases were selected; the sample is not representative of the entire U.S. population or of any definable group in the population. This fault limits the comparability and appropriateness of the Kinsey data as a basis for calculating the prevalence of any form of sexual conduct."
The book also notes that Kinsey’s agenda for sexual liberation tainted his research: "The very claim for the legitimacy of science in the area of sexuality was an attempt to change the ‘rules of the game’ that defined what conduct was normal and what was abnormal.
"Kinsey went even further, however. He attempted to counter the traditional religious view that sexual virtue was entirely composed of heterosexual activity in the pursuit of reproduction inside the bonds of marriage, as well as the orthodox psychoanalytic revision of this traditional view, which admitted the existence of other forms of sexual expression but treated them as either perversions from or preludes to the sexual ‘normality’ found in mature heterosexual committed relationships." (p. 86)
In 1997, in his book Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life, biographer James H. Jones revealed Kinsey’s prodigious appetite for sadistic varieties of homosexual sex, voyeurism and other perversions, and how they inspired his social agenda:
"The man I came to know bore no resemblance to the canonical Kinsey. Anything but disinterested, he approached his work with missionary fervor. Kinsey loathed Victorian morality. … He was determined to use science to strip human sexuality of its guilt and repression. He wanted to undermine traditional morality, to soften the rules of restraint. …Kinsey was a crypto-reformer who spent his every waking hour attempting to change the sexual mores and sex offender laws of the United States." (p. xii)
Based on his own imagination, Kinsey created his famous 7-point Kinsey scale of sexuality, with heterosexuality at 0 and homosexuality at 6 (bisexuality being a "balanced" score at 3.5). He drew a line from 0 upward and rightward to make a perfect diagonal, as if human sexuality could be precisely and geometrically charted. This entirely fabricated "scientific" scale has been used in sex education books, court cases and legislative hearings to contend that homosexuality and bisexuality are normative. Kinsey concocted the scale even before he had done any substantial interviewing of data subjects, according to his co-author, Wardell Pomeroy.
Dr. Reisman, who has pursued the Kinsey myth for three decades, authored another book in 1998, showing how Kinsey’s research became the foundation for America’s sexual revolution. In Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences (First Principles Press, 1998, 2000), she also chronicled how Kinsey and his disciples systematically weakened America’s sex offender laws by inserting the fraudulent Kinsey data into cases, law review articles, and presentations before state legislatures.
Kinsey’s legacy in the form of a cultural blitzkrieg against sexual restraint – and therefore against marriage and family — has been enormous. He just might be the most influential fraud in American social history.
As far as "gay" activist Franklin Kameny’s boast of using the Kinsey research as his lodestar, it’s a welcome and revealing confession, although it is doubtful that Mr. Kameny would see it that way.
Robert Knight is the director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America. Knight wrote and directed The Children of Table 34, a Family Research Council video documentary about Alfred Kinsey.
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
Government-paid sheik says Jews a virus to be destroyed!
CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THIS STORY POSTED ON WORLDNETDAILY.COM
He continues to say that Osama bin Laden is innocent until proven guilty, but that Senator Tom Delay should go to jail.
Even some of Delay's biggest critics are stepping back from what Howard "The Scream" Dean is saying, even the homosexual members of Congress.
Fellow Democrat Barney Frank, a liberal Massachusetts congressman, said Monday on television that he considered the comment "very unfair."
"I think it was inappropriate," Frank said. "I'm a great critic of Tom DeLay's . . . but to say that he's a criminal, at this point there's no basis for that."
Senator Delay has not even been brought up on any criminal charges, but Democrat Leader is quick to shoot off his big mouth saying that "Tom Delay should go back to Texas to serve his jail sentence." while defending Terrorist Leader and murderous Islamofacist Osama bin Laden.
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
research reveals that He compiled statistics of “normal” sexual behavior by
including a high percentage of pedophiles, inmates, sex
offenders, pimps and prostitutes and described them as
“average” Americans. He kept no records that could
corroborate his findings.
1. The Kinsey data are the scientific basis for the Model
Penal Code, which led to the elimination or reduction in
penalties for sex offenses, including rape, child abuse and
2. Kinsey’s data are also the basis for most of America’s sex
education curricula, which begin with the premise that
children are “sexual beings” entitled to sex at all ages.
3. He believed that all sexual behaviors were “natural,”
including bestiality, pedophilia, homosexuality, sodomy
and sadistic sex. He argued that sex and morality had no
4. He collected data on the sexual abuse of hundreds of
infants and children with the purpose of recording
5. He believed there was nothing inherently wrong with
child-adult sex except for reactions to it based on
6. Kinsey filmed his wife masturbating and having sex with
other staff members and he himself had sex with all of his
7. He filmed himself masturbating and performing
masochistic acts on himself. Biographers report that he
may have fatally injured himself during a bizarre
1. Kinsey’s “science” was fraudulent and in some cases criminal.
2. Children were sexually molested for the data that Kinsey gathered.
3. An entire sex education industry grew out of Kinsey’s deceptive data.
4. The Kinsey-engineered Model Penal Code resulted in reducing penalties for sex offenses, such as rape and molestation, thus putting women and children at increased risk.
Anyone who thinks that this man was a gift to the sexual world, needs to have their head examined and maybe even consider sterilization. You can be sure that there will be more to follow on this sick perverse bastard in the future.
Sources: James Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (New York: W.W.
Norton & Company, 1997). Dr. Judith A. Reisman, Kinsey: Crimes &
Consequences (Crestwood, Kentucky, 2000). Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and
Edward W. Eichel, Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People
(Lafayette, Louisiana: Lochinvar-Huntington House, 1990).
I am waiting for the anti-G-d A C L U to come out in full force on this one. They defend murderous blood thirsty IslamoFacicists but spit on the beliefs of Jews and Christians.
Whenever a Jewish cemetary is vandalized, you don't see the Hasidic Jews rampaging in the streets killing Christians and other non Jews. Same goes for when some neo-nazi freak of nature scum bag burns down a Babtist church in the south, you don't see the Christians burning down homes and beheading non-believers...But wait one minute, if a Koran is RUMORED to have been flushed down a toilet, then I guess it's time to let the killing begin. Heads will roll. Jews and Christians alike and all non-believers in Islam. What a double standard there has become, and the liberal media is latching on to the coat tails of the IslamoFacists and riding rough shod over Jews and Christians.
I just cannot wait to see what the liberal media will do next to lie, cheat and steal their way into making President Bush and all Americans look bad in the eyes of the world.
According to Epstein, Moore manipulated the press in Madonna-like manner, faking a censorship threat to get cheap P.R.
In May 2003, Michael Eisner, then CEO of Disney, exercised his right under an agreement with Miramax to veto Disney distribution. But Miramax, a Disney subsidiary, still held the rights to the film.
Head of Miramax Harvey Weinstein planned to sell the distribution rights to "Fahrenheit 9/11" after it was screened at the Cannes Film Festival.
On the eve of Cannes and seemingly right on cue, a front-page article appeared in the New York Times. The headline read: "Disney Is Blocking Distribution of Film That Criticizes Bush."
The piece claimed that Eisner's action in keeping Disney out of the distribution loop was motivated by concerns that Disney could potentially lose tax breaks in Florida, "where Mr. Bush's brother, Jeb, is governor."
A couple of days after the Times article appeared, Moore did a Web site post that indicated Disney's board of directors had passed on the film "last week."
But the Disney board had done no such thing. The flick had been vetoed by Eisner the previous year.
Eisner retained the rights to profit on Moore's film but wanted Disney to maintain its distance. So Miramax sold the "Fahrenheit 9/11" rights to the Weinstein brothers, who then transferred the rights to another entity called Fellowship Adventure Group. In the process, the brothers were able to arrange some very favorable distribution deals.
In the end, Disney netted $78 million and paid Moore a hefty $21 million.
Moore never disclosed the amount of his profit participation. When asked about it, he told reporters, "I don't read the contracts."
The Rogue Jew heard that Moore was so mad about the news that blemished his workingman image, he punched a hole in the wall of the servants' quarters.
As museums go, it isn't up to much. When you reach the building, after a winding ascent through the old Arab, half-Christian, half-Muslim, hill town of Nazareth, there is no sign to announce what's inside. The gallery itself, in a single room and a short, drab, corridor leading off it, consists of just 80 photographs which the owner/curator, lawyer Khaled Mahameed bought from the Yad Vashem museum shop last year for about £1 each, most with explanatory captions in Arabic that he has written himself. And as Mr Mahameed admits, it isn't exactly yet a star attraction for the visitors and pilgrims who regularly stream in to see the place where the Annunciation took place and the boy Jesus grew up.
It is a remarkable innovation nonetheless. For this is almost certainly the first Arab museum and teaching centre anywhere devoted exclusively to the Holocaust. As such it is an attempt, however faltering, to bridge the chasm between two views of history. A chasm powerfully illustrated by memorial events in the past week on each side of that divide. Sunday was Nakba day, the annual commemoration of the flight and expulsion of about 750,000 Palestinians from what became Israel in 1948.
In Israel Thursday was celebrated, as usual, by a holiday, Independence Day. Both events essentially mark the same historical moment; the end of the British mandate and the victorious creation of the state of Israel. Yet both equally reflect two entirely alternative realities which seldom meet.
To underline the contrast, sirens echoed through the West Bank and Gaza just like those that have been sounded twice in Israel over the past month: in memory of the Holocaust's victims and - last Wednesday - in memory of all Israelis who have died in war for their country.
Mr Mahameed, an Israeli Arab, is driven by an unusual passion - which he has pursued to the neglect of his own legal practice, a total cost of 20,000 shekels (£2,400), the ridicule of some of his fellow Muslims, a studied lack of interest by the town's (Christian) Arab mayor, and a deep family rift with his own brother. He wants to introduce Arabs here in Israel and further afield to the horrors of the Holocaust, a history which he is convinced Palestinians must start to appreciate before they can ever resolve their own plight, and which is sympathetically and factually related in an illustrated booklet he has also produced in Arabic.
Mufid Khatib, the morning's only visitor hasn't, as it happens, come to see the exhibition but to have Mr Mahameed look over some legal documents. But he decides while he's here to study some of the bleak photographs of a synagogue burning amid the destruction of Kristallnacht; the chilling juxtaposition of a smugly smiling boy in a miniature SS uniform basking in Hitler's avuncular gaze, and an emaciated child in the Warsaw ghetto; a row of shirtless Jews facing a wall in front of an Einsatzgruppen death squad; a man contemplating the unbearable sight of his family's incinerated corpses.
Something similar must have been shown on Israeli television, Mr Khatib accepts, but he wasn't paying attention. "All the pictures are very painful," he says. "They're horrible. I heard about this, but this is the first time I saw the pictures. The message of the exhibition is very clear."
There is a debate between Mr Khatib and Mr Mahameed, deliberately provoked by the museum's owner. Mr Mahameed continually tries - somewhat artificially at times - to dramatise his message that to understand the Nakba or catastrophe in which Palestinians - including, as it happens, Mr Khatib's family - were evicted or fled from their homes during the 1948 war, it is essential first to understand the Holocaust.
Pointing at the photograph of the emaciated and unimaginably bereaved death camp survivor, he tells Mr Khatib: "This is the man who took your land in the Carmel. Maybe if you understand him he will give you back your land." Understandably unconvinced by the crudity, crassness even, of this suggestion, Mr Khatib says nevertheless that he is wholly in favour of the Holocaust pictures being exhibited, but adds: "I have a proposal: which is to put pictures of the Nakba side by side with these." Mr Mahameed, doesn't agree; he believes every Palestinian carries that collective memory in his head already. By contrast there is a long and ignominious history of denying - or at least minimising - the Holocaust in the Arab world. And while increasing numbers of Israeli Arab children, subject to a state-approved curriculum, do learn about it, it is still not taught in Palestinian Authority schools in the West Bank and Gaza because, says the PA's education spokesman Muhanad Rashid, of the "fear of a negative reaction from the Palestinian people".
Pinned on the door leading from the gallery to Mr Mahameed's office, a notice in Arabic summarises his version of Middle East history as that of the victims' victims. "The Palestinians are the only people in the world who for the sake of providing shelter to the Jews have paid their homeland as a price for the sins and the deeds of the Nazis." It's not always easy to work out whether Mr Mahameed is a visionary or an eccentric. Refusing to say where he stands on a solution to the conflict - beyond saying he is not in favour of violent resistance to the occupation - he seems to have an almost mystical belief in the power of an understanding by Palestinians of the Holocaust to bring them peace and justice; on the other hand he has a common-sense view that the mutually exclusive historical rights claimed by Jews and Arabs over this land will never lead to the compromises needed for peace. Yet he is touching on - and attempting in his own unorthodox way to remedy - something profound: the deep resistance by each people to the historical narrative of the other.
That Mr Khatib may be part of a modestly growing trend, at least among some intellectuals on each side to understand the other's history better, became apparent at a meeting in Nazareth last month between an international delegation of mayors with two members of a highly unusual joint Jewish Arab delegation which visited Auschwitz two years ago at the instigation of a far-sighted Christian Arab priest from Nazareth, Achimandrite Emile Shoufani. Geula Lapid, an Israeli ex-education official - a kibbutznik but not on the left - and Nazir Majali, a Palestinian commentator and former communist, embraced each other on the platform from which they had both spoken with a real warmth forged in that joint experience. Mr Majali explained how despite strong initial criticisms from some Arab politicians he and his colleagues, both Muslim and Christian had resolved to go on a pilgrimage which he said imparted "not just information but understanding" of Jewish pain. If anything, Ms Lapid's short talk was even more remarkable.
Describing how her generation shared the conviction that the state of Israel was "the only possible answer" to the Holocaust and the only way to prevent history repeating itself, she read a famous passage - to Israelis - from a letter written to his girlfriend by a 21 year old, Otto Pfeniger, four years before he was killed in the Six Day War of 1967. Having just read a book about the Holocaust, he wrote: "I can never forget this! - I feel that from the horror and helplessness, a huge power rising inside me to be strong; strong to tears; strong and sharp as a knife, silent and terrible; that is how I want to be! I want to know that never again will eyes stare behind electric fences! They will not, only if I am strong! If we are all strong! Strong proud Jews! We will never be led to slaughter again." Ms Lapid commented: "Those words represented our feelings in those days."
Forty years later, essentially the same message was delivered by the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon this month on Holocaust Memorial Day - that the Jews can rely only on themselves, and a strong, militarily-defended Israel is the one guarantee that Jews will never again exist in a world with no home." Few Israelis would disagree with that. But Ms Lapid does not believe this should be the only lesson from the Holocaust. "Since [the Sixties] I have grown, matured and learned that the reality in which we live is very complex ... But you lose a lot if you are constantly preoccupied by the need to be strong, driven by the fear of the possibility of being attacked again because of being Jewish."
Ms Lapid, who was born in Israel, had, she said, found the prospect of a visit to Auschwitz unbearable. But having been "enriched" by working with Arab educationists on bringing Jewish and Israeli Arab schools in much closer contact with each others' cultures she was attracted by the idea of joint visit. "Thus I, who never wanted to be in that terrible place, found myself in Auschwitz hugged and surrounded by my Arab friends. Friends that identified with my pain and my feelings of insult and indignity. It was such an empowering and enriching experience words are inadequate to describe it." But Ms Lapid also understands the potential for this to be a two-way process. In the seminars to prepare for the Auschwitz trip, a young Palestinian woman told the group: "We are the true victims of the Holocaust, because you, the victims of the Holocaust, turned us into victims..." Ms Lapid says: "It does not matter if I agree with her: What is important is that I could understand the position from which she felt and spoke."
Ms Lapid says that Israeli Arab children learn "far more" about Israeli history than they do about that of the Palestinians. "Because we live in a multitude of cultures we have to change our way of education. On both sides - but because we are the majority we have to do much more than the minority in changing, in having a wider point of view."
The most prominent Palestinian intellectual to denounce attempts to deny or minimise the Holocaust was Edward Said. In the late Nineties he argued - rightly - that it would be foolish "even to try" to equate the Holocaust with the Nakba, adding, "who would want morally to equate mass extermination with mass dispossession?" But like Mr Mahameed he argued equally trenchantly - "a different thing altogether" - that the two events were connected. Since then, in a remarkable new book Shared Histories: A Palestinian-Israeli dialogue the Palestinian writer and journalist Ata Qaymari, who learnt his excellent Hebrew as a leftist PFLP prisoner in Israeli jails, makes an eloquent plea for mutual understanding by Israelis and Palestinians of each other's history after discussing some of the reasons for the alienated reaction by many Palestinians to the Holocaust. He points out that Palestinians tend to see Jews as "using, indeed ... misusing, the Holocaust not only to rally support for Israel's aggression against Palestinians but also to diminish or underestimate Palestinian sufferings."
He writes: "?How dare you compare anything with the Holocaust!' is the usual Jewish reaction. In the Holocaust an entire people was persecuted and doomed to total annihilation they (rightly) say." Correct though that is, suggests Mr Qaymari, it leads the Holocaust to seem to many Palestinians like an "excuse and a camouflage for the atrocities and injustices which Israel thrusts upon them." Another Palestinian, Aziz Haider, complains in a discussion reported in the book that he was invited by the Israeli education ministry to draw up a common Arab-Jewish curriculum but that the work stalled for many months because although the Arabs accepted "the Holocaust ... independence, everything" the Israelis refused for a long time to accept any inclusion of the Nakba.
At a discussion to mark publication of the book in Jerusalem this week, Mr Qaymari said many Palestinians wondered why Jews did not also draw a lesson about minorities as well as the need for a strong Israel; "how can the people of the Holocaust do bad things to us?" He added: "We have our own catastrophe which is still going on. If we understand your catastrophe and hardship, you have to understand ours." But Mr Qaymari concludes his paper with a clarion call for Palestinians "to recognise the Holocaust and its victims, not just numbers but names. When names substitute for numbers and the conflict is thus humanised, the solution will be round the corner."
At their meeting in Nazareth, Mr Majali and Ms Lapid each stressed the importance of mutual understanding for its own, humanising sake, as well as a step, however initially modest, towards resolving conflict. Mr Majali says: "Some of us, Arabs in Israel, thought we have to do something against the conflict. The two people have no idea about the other. How can you have peace together unless you know about the other's past? He adds: "We do this not for something in return but for our culture, for our humanity as Arabs. We do it for ourselves." Did Ms Lapid think it was important for Jewish children to learn what the Nakba meant for Palestinians as well as for Arab children to learn about the Holocaust? "Our obligation is to hear the story the Arabs want to tell us. I don't have to agree with them, but we have an obligation to listen to how they see what happened here. And we have to learn the facts."We can have different interpretations but we have to deal with it. We can't say there's only one way to teach history." Like Mr Majali she adds: "For our sake. Not only to be nice to the Arabs, but for our sake and for the sake of the two peoples who live here."
Muslim double standard on religious desecration?
Islamic world blasted for protesting Quran 'story,' silence on Jewish incidents
CLICK ON POST TITLE TO READ THIS ARTICLE!
Monday, May 16, 2005
To me, having read NewsWeek in the past, this is not much of a newsflash. I cancelled my subscription that my beautiful wife had gotten me for my birthday last year because I felt that the News that they reported was very slanted and biased, much like their television counterparts at CBS, especially the dubious dupee, Dan Rather who in a orgasmic flurry, could not wait to report a story about President Bush's military service that turned out to be based on falsified and misleading information.
Shame on you NewsWeek. Not only did you report something that was a lie, but your story has gotten people killed in riots in muslim controled countries. I believe that your only purpose in reporting such a story was not to report "news" but an attempt to make the President and his administration look bad, along with our military men and women who are in GITMO dealing with these slimeballs on a daily basis, thus ignoring the fact that these islamofacists that are being held there as unlawful combatants want to kill Americans and Jews. But at least you got to report your story.
It is in my honest opinion that NewsWeek magazine falls into the same news reporting bracket as the Enquirer, STAR, and all of those other supermarket tabloids, much as CBS and Dan Rather have fallen into the same slime pit as The Jerry Springer Show, ROSIE, and RICKY LAKE SHOW, and yes even the "whose your daddy" show of MAURY! All a bunch of schmucks.
Sunday, May 15, 2005
RNC: Kennedy Sought to Abolish Filibuster
Here is more proof that the Liberal, socailist Democrat Party is more interested in their own power and divisive partisan politics, then actually doing anything constructive and positive for the American people that "Employ" them. As usual they have no positive agenda, no ideas, and no true leadership for America.
The Republican National Committee came out swinging Sunday after Sen. Ted Kennedy lambasted the Republican drive to end the Senate filibuster.
"Sen. Ted Kennedy's hypocritical and obstructionist comments this morning are more evidence Democrats would rather launch partisan political attacks than confront the issues facing our nation," the RNC statement said.
The RNC noted that in 1995, Sen. Kennedy supported abolishing the filibuster.
In 1995, Democratic Senators Bingaman, Boxer, Feingold, Harkin, Kennedy, Kerry, Lautenberg, Lieberman and Sarbanes all voted to end the filibuster.
The Republicans also chastised Kennedy for flip-flopping on previous statements he made indicating that filibusters should not be used to block judicial votes.
In 1998, Kennedy said: "We owe it to Americans across the country to give these nominees a vote. If our Republican colleagues don't like them, vote against them. But give them a vote."
immediately goes to hell, where the devil is waiting for him "I don't know what to do here," says the devil. "You are on my list, but I have no room
for you. You definitely have to stay here, so I'll tell you what I'm going to do. I've got a couple of folks here who weren't quite as bad as you.
I'll let one of them go, but you have to take their place. I'll even let
YOU decide who leaves." Jesse thought that sounded pretty good, so the
devil opened the door to the first room. In it, was Ted Kennedy and a large pool of water. He kept diving in, and surfacing, empty handed. Over, and over, and over he dove in and surfaced with nothing. Such was his fate in hell. "No," Jesse said. "I don't think so. I'm not a good swimmer, and I don't think I could do that all day long." The devil led him to the door of the next room. In it was Al Gore with a sledgehammer and a room full of rocks. All he did was swing that hammer, time after time after time. "No,I've got this problem with my shoulder. I would be in constant agony if all I could do was break rocks all day," commented Jesse. The devil opened a third door. Through it, Jesse saw Bill Clinton, lying on the floor with his arms tied over his head, and his legs restrained in a spread-eagle pose. Bent over him was Monica Lewinsky, doing what she does best. Jesse looked at this in shocked disbelief, and finally said, "Yeah, I can handle this." The devil smiled and said . . . (This is priceless) "OK, Monica, you're free to go."
Senator Barbara Boxer, a Liberal, Gun grabbing, socialist Democrat from the Fruit and Nut state of Confusion, (California) has promised to stop the nomination of Bolton "at all costs."
Larry Flynt, who was digging for nude photos of the Bush twins and even offered up $10 million dollars if any could be found, is spear heading the dirt digging for Democrat leaders by telling them they should look into Bolton's 1982 divorce.
If dirt is what they are looking for, then Democrats should start by cleaning out their own closets of the adulterous, drunken, felonious members of their party. I.E Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and once again Bill Clinton, for here you have an adulterer, a drunk and a war criminal!
Scum bags looking for dirt....What a hoot!
"An airplane comes through the restricted airspace and they evacuated White House and Capital. But Ted Kennedy, he stayed cool. He told the security guy 'Cover me, I'm going to Hooters.'" --David Letterman
"Congress was evacuated and it caused a 15-minute interruption of getting absolutely nothing accomplished." --David Letterman
"Did you see people rushing out of the Capital? It was unbelievable. That was the fastest Congress ever moved that didn't involve giving themselves a pay raise. What was really scary was Tom DeLay. He had to get 25 family members on the payroll out of there. There hasn't been this kind of panic and evacuation in the White House since that night in '98 when Hillary came home early." --Jay Leno
"Laura described herself as a desperate housewife whose husband goes to bed to early. To which Hillary said 'That must be nice.'" --Jay Leno
"I guess you all heard about the big scare at the White House yesterday. You know about this? A false alarm about a plane violating White House airspace caused the Secret Service to evacuate the president from the Oval Office. That shows you how times have changed. Remember back in the '90s when a false alarm just meant Hillary's coming?" --Jay Leno
"Bush asked Bill Clinton for advice about what to do in Iraq and he said 'Don't pull out until you hear her husband's car in the drive way.'" --Craig Ferguson
"Anti-war protesters have now showed up at the Michael Jackson trial because they realize, hey, cameras and free publicity. One embarrassing moment, a protesters had a sign the other day that said, 'Bring our boys home.'" --Bill Maher
"In an interview over the weekend on Japanese television, Bill Clinton said Hillary would make a great president -- lousy intern but great, great president." --Jay Leno
"Hillary Clinton said today that she wants legislation to allow all ex-felons to vote. See, this way all the Clinton’s former business partners can vote for her in 2008." --Jay Leno
Tuesday, July 15, 2003
For me as a feminist, there’s nothing more frustrating than watching the destruction wrought by the leftists who have hijacked the feminist establishment. The last few months have been a veritable Coney Island experience for the posers in charge. Hillary Clinton. Patricia Ireland. The “new” Ms. magazine. Need I go on? Yes, we may have to reach for the Pepto, but only at first. While it is entirely reasonable to get increasingly frustrated at the carnage wrought by cultural parasites, their folly serves as perfect examples for decent people about what not to let continue.
Let’s start with feminist elite darling Hillary Clinton. Just last week the book her three ghostwriters wrote for her, “Living History,” (which would be more appropriately titled “How I Sold My Soul for Power and a Man with No Pants”) went audio and is close to selling 1 million copies. That’s not surprising. Millions of Americans love fiction. What is disturbing is the presumption that Clinton is the Grand Dame of authentic feminism. For those of us who would love to see a woman as president of the United States, it is appalling that the woman of choice for the feminist elite contradicts everything authentic feminism stands for.
Isn’t it just slightly ironic that those who chant and march for women’s safety and dignity are in a rapturous hysteria over a woman who has enabled placing specific women in her husband’s reach in danger while assaulting the dignity of women everywhere with her sycophantic support of a man who has cuckolded her in front of the world? Go, girl, go!
Let me be clear: Hillary Clinton is the anti-feminist. I consider her one of the most dangerous people in the nation, specifically because she has power and the reach to sell 1 million books. Because she has managed to enthrall a nation by pretending to be something she’s not. As a feminist, Clinton disgusts me because she single-handedly has managed to tell women the world over that no matter what your husband does – humiliate you, betray you, lie to you, abuse other women, sexually harass other women, intimidate women, even possibly be a rapist – you should not only not leave him, you should forever support and enable that behavior.
While on the topics of hypocrisy and moral relativism I would be remiss if I didn’t discuss ex-National Organization for Women president Patricia Ireland. I was guest hosting for a national radio program a couple of weeks ago and railed against Ireland and her appointment as the CEO of the YWCA. While conservative religious groups have understandably assailed this event, I know Ireland and was a leader in NOW while she ran it into the ground.
A caller to that program opined that it sounded like I had “an ax to grind.” You bet I do. It’s having watched Ireland hijack NOW and change a feminist organization into one of “social justice,” a code phrase among Socialists for the Leftists’ agenda, primarily focusing on “racism” and perpetuating the pit of victimhood. This debasement of NOW’s initially noble agenda of empowerment into one of promoting hopelessness and alienation has understandably repulsed millions of Americans.
After the YWCA appointment, Ireland refused to say whether or not she’s a Christian (she’s not), and then finally stated in the New York Times (April 30, 2003) that the YWCA would no longer be a Christian organization, but one of – surprise! – Social Justice. That does not bode well for the tens of thousands of little girls and their families who rely on the YWCA.
The last piece of recent drivel regurgitated by the feminist establishment is the supposedly new and improved Ms. magazine. It’s neither, by the way. On the cover of the Summer 2003 issue (http://www.msmagazine.com) is Janeane Garofalo (where are they selling this tripe? Mars?). Garofalo is featured in a story with “Susan Sarandon, the Dixie Chicks and all your favorite free speech stars.” Really? They’re not my favorites. They’re not the favorites of the majority of feminists or anyone else in this nation. Is Ms. finally simply trying to prove how desperately hypocritical and out-of-touch the feminist establishment really is?
After all, who can forget the obscene attack on the free speech of a Jewish woman who dared to speak her mind a few years ago? She was attacked by the New Gestapo for using an unapproved-of word. There was a very public attempt to destroy that woman, professionally and personally, because she dared to speak her opinion about serious social issues. Gee, kinda like what Sarandon and the Dixie Chicks are claiming.
Was she featured in Ms. magazine? Is her case discussed in their article about the assault on freedom of expression? Of course not, because the woman I’m speaking of is Dr. Laura, and the gang that flew into a jihad to destroy her was the gay establishment, along with the help of the Feminist Elite and hypocrites like Susan Sarandon. The double standard is stunning, and exposes nothing less than the partisan Leftist agenda, which has been masquerading as feminism for far too long.
What would a truly feminist magazine have included in its content if its goal were to represent women in all our independence and uniqueness? While stories about Garofalo and Sarandon are fine, a story about Dr. Laura would have been welcomed. And what about a profile of Condoleezza Rice, the most powerful woman in the nation (OK, in the whole world) and who also happens to be black? Oh, but I forgot. Rice has committed two unforgivable crimes: She doesn’t live in either the black or feminist ghettos the Left has set up for her “type.” No, she’s her own woman, is decent, doesn’t lie to people, and isn’t a victim. How dare she!
Instead of lamenting the state of affairs, tell yourself, your mother, sister, daughter, that while there isn’t an authentic feminist movement at the moment, that can change. In the meantime, don’t be fooled – choose your own feminist heroes (like Dr. Laura and Condoleezza Rice), don’t expect (or want!) to agree with them on every single issue, but appreciate those women and so many others who are true to themselves and their principles. Lastly, look at appalling negatives – like Clinton, Ireland and the individuals and myopic agenda featured in Ms. magazine – as benchmarks of what not to become.
Tammy Bruce is a former president of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW and a contributing editor to FrontPageMagazine.com. She is the author of "The New Thought Police" and "The Death of Right and Wrong."
Saturday, May 14, 2005
Friday, May 13, 2005
by Ted Nugent
With all the yapping and hand wringing about Homeland Defense, I’m somewhat perplexed there hasn’t been more discussion about how average Americans can secure their country from terrorists, thugs and otherassorted human debris and scum. You heard it here first: homeland defense begins at home. It is each American’s responsibility to protect themselves and their families from those who want to perpetrate harm upon us. I could care less what the creep’s religious, political or ideological intentions are, or whether he simply wants to steal your Buick at gunpoint. A killer is a killer and they must be stopped. I pray the feds have the resources, intelligence, and commitment to exterminate terrorists around the world. I also pray the local cops have the same resources to lock up local punks who have instigated their own criminal jihad against law-abiding citizens. Pray as I might, I also adamantly believe each of us should be prepared to neutralize evil in its tracks whenever and wherever it may arize. Waiting for the feds or the cops to show up might be a death sentence - our death sentence. Crime reports, studies and honest cops will tell you that it is up to you to defend yourself and your loved ones against evil people. Fortunately, the majority of states allow their citizens to carry concealed weapons to do just that. Afterall, to be unarmed is to be helpless, and that's just irresponsible. Though the media won’t tell you this, law-abiding citizens use guns to thwart crime roughly two million times a year.
The media’s silence on these facts is condemnable. Instead of reporting the facts, the media whores engage in journalistic prostitution as it pertains to guns. They will 'report' or spin the story to meet their left-wing ideology that guns are evil, unnecessary instruments designed solely to kill other people. I’m sure two million people a year would beg to differ with the media’s overt dishonesty and unprofessional anti-gun agenda. The average American is much more likely to be the victim of a recidivistic punk who has a rap sheet a yard long than of a Muslim extremist. Therefore, it only stands to reason that we must be more vigilant to protect our homes and lives against the streetrats than the religious numbskulls who kill in the name of their evil gods. I’m not arguing that everyone run out and get a permit to carry a concealed weapon. First off, everyone is not going to do everything that makes sense all the time. Secondly, only those people who feel comfortable carrying a concealed weapon and who routinely practice with it should carry do so. There are literally millions of Americans who carry concealed weapons on a daily basis. The media has unabashedly tried to convince Americans that this practice is extremely dangerous, that ordinary Americans will shoot at each other in traffic, and that accidental shootings will far outway any benefit. Again, the media whores couldn’t be more wrong. The number of concealed carry permits that have been rescinded is literally minuscule, virtually a non-issue. There haven’t been shootouts between concealed carry holders as the media tried in vain to scare Americans into believing. Concealed carry permit holders haven’t shot the wrong guy. Concealed carry permit holders haven’t committed crimes. Instead, these conscientious Americans have made America a safer place to live, work and play. Isn’t that the goal of Homeland Defense? Americans need to be vigilant. We need to get to know our neighbors better. We need to become more involved in great programs such as Neighborhood Watch. We need to establish better relationships with our police departments. I support any effort that will truly assist in stopping the next terrorist or thug who wishes to bring harm to innocent, law-abiding Americans. I will never, however, support any effort that will make it easier for criminals to prey on innocent Americans because Sarah Brady doesn't believe in us to take care of ourselves. Homeland defense begins at home. There are millions of Americans each year that can attest to that. The heroic actions of these brave Americans need to be recognized, even celebrated, not hidden from the public view by the media, or worse, scorned. We have the legal right and a moral duty to protect our loved ones and ourselves. I don’t depend on anyone else for my family’s protection. That would be foolish, dangerous and cowardly. When I call 911 it will only be tell them to bring a dustpan and a broom. I shoot back, and depending on the circumstances, I’ll shoot first. You’re weird if you’ve got a problem with that. Good should live, evil should die. Make a stand America. Neutralize evil or get out of their way.
People quite often are unreasonable, illogical and self-centered. Love them anyway!
If you do good, people may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives. Do good anyway!
If you are successful, you will win some false friends and true enemies. Succeed anyway!
The good you do today will be forgotten tomorrow. Do good anyway!
Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable. Be honest and frank anyway!
The biggest people with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest people with the smallest minds. Think big anyway!
People favor underdogs, but follow only top dogs. Fight for some underdogs anyway!
What you spend years building may be destroyed overnight. Build anyway!
People really need help, but may attack you if you help them. Help them anyway!
Give the world the best you have and you might get kicked in the teeth. Give the world the best you've got anyway!
GOOD LUCK AND GOD BLESS YOU!
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by encouraging class hatred. You cannot help the poor by discouraging the rich. You cannot establish sound security on borrowed money. You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn. You cannot build character and courage by taking away man's initiative and independence. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln
Anyone who has read my blog knows how I feel about liberals. My feeling about people is just something that I cannot hide or disguise.
We all know by now that Liberal Democrats are racist, obstructionist, American hating, undercover socialist communists, pussies who offer no new ideas, and no true leadership for America with a concern for our security and sovereignty as a super power nation.
Liberals only plan for America is to have us bend over and grab our ankles and take it up the ass by every "old world Eurotrash thugs, and murderous islamic jihadist that is out there dreaming about America's destruction.
My goal is not to convert liberals. Liberals in the true sense just are not ever going to realize how clueless and out of touch they are. Liberal Democrat leaders if you want to call them "leaders" are like cowboys leading cows to be slaughtered and served on their own tables. They pander to the stupid losers of the world who cannot even cast their votes correctly, let alone come out of their drug induced haze long eneough to remember that it is election day.
Liberals "Leaders" have even trained their minority constituency that do come out to vote, to do so with their hand out. "Vote for me, and I will give you the world." Empty promises made to people to lazy to become successful on their own, without the help of big government. Their's is the party of "You scratch my back, and I promise to scratch yours later." (Wink, wink)
Lip service is all that they offer to the dreams of freedom and liberty. They boast being the party of minorities and women, but when it comes to defending and fighting for those rights, they stick their heads in the sand and up their asses.
My wife asked me one day if I thought that a liberal democrat could have any redeeming values that I could admire, and I had to say unequivocaly....Absolutely Not! But for the record, I must add, that I mean "Liberal Democratic Leadership" in Washington. Their base of constituents are like seagulls hovering around a boat full of people waiting for a scrap of food to be thrown to them.
I make no apology for my feelings or these thoughts. If you feel that I have described you then YOU need to take a look in the mirror and ask yourself, "IS THAT ME?" "Am I a seagull waiting for a government scrap to be thrown to me?"
This is just my opinion, I may be wrong, BUT I DOUBT IT! The Rogue Jew
Thursday, May 12, 2005
HE IS THE MARICOPA ARIZONA COUNTY SHERIFF
AND HE KEEPS GETTING ELECTED OVER AND OVER.
THIS IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY:
Sheriff Joe Arpaio (in Arizona) who created the "tent city jail":
He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.
He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails. Took away their weights. Cut off all but "G" movies.
He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and city projects.
Then he started chain gangs for women so he wouldn't get sued for discrimination.
He took away cable TV until he found out there was a federal court order that required cable TV for jails. So he hooked up the cable TV again only let in the Disney channel and the weather channel.
When asked why the weather channel he replied, so they will know how hot it's gonna be while they are working on my chain gangs.
He cut off coffee since it has zero nutritional value.
When the inmates complained, he told them, "This isn't the Ritz/Carlton. If you don't like it, don't come back."
He bought Newt Gingrich' lecture series on videotape that he pipes into the jails.
When asked by a reporter if he had any lecture series by a Democrat, he replied that a democratic lecture series might explain why a lot of the inmates were in his jails in the first place.
More on the Arizona Sheriff:
With temperatures being even hotter than usual in Phoenix (116 degrees just set a new record), the Associated Press reports: About 2,000 inmates living in a barbed-wire-surrounded tent encampment at the Maricopa County Jail have been given permission to strip down to their government-issued pink boxer shorts.
On Wednesday, hundreds of men wearing boxers were either curled up on their bunk beds or chatted in the tents, which reached 138 degrees inside the week before.
Many were also swathed in wet, pink towels as sweat collected on their chests and dripped down to their pink socks.
"It feels like we are in a furnace," said James Zanzot, an inmate who has lived in the tents for 1 = years. "It's inhumane."
Joe Arpaio, the tough-guy sheriff who created the tent city and long ago started making his prisoners wear pink, and eat bologna sandwiches, is not one bit sympathetic He said Wednesday that he told all of the inmates: "It's 120 degrees in Iraq and our soldiers are living in tents too, and they have to wear full battle gear, but they didn't commit any crimes, so shut your damned mouths!"
Way to go, Sheriff! Maybe if all prisons were like this one there would be a lot less crime and/or repeat offenders. Criminals should be punished for their crimes - not live in luxury until it's time for their parole, only to go out and commit another crime so they can get back in to live on taxpayers money and enjoy things taxpayers can't afford to have for themselves.
Sheriff Joe was just reelected Sheriff in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
Character matters; leadership descends from character.
Compassion is no substitute for justice.
Did you know that the White House drug test is multiple choice?
Enraging liberals is simply one of the more enjoyable side effects of my wisdom.
Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.
Football is like life and I know life.
I don't consider myself an offensive guy. I am just a harmless lovable little fuzzball.
I don't need equal time, I am equal time!
If Thomas Jefferson thought taxation without representation was bad, he should see how it is with representation.
Liberal Democrats are inexorably opposed to tax cuts, because tax cuts give people more power, and take away from the role of government.
No nation ever taxed itself into prosperity.
Poverty is not the root cause of crime.
Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of the twentieth century.
The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit.
The last thing they want is a revitalized economy now. I'm not saying the Democrats don't want a strong economy. Don't misunderstand. They just don't want it now.
The Los Angeles riots were not caused by the Rodney King verdict. The Los Angeles riots were caused by rioters.
We are born to action; and whatever is capable of suggesting and guiding action has power over us from the first.
Will some reporter, or some Republican on the Sunday shows, please ask why tax cuts raid the non-existent Social Security Trust Fund but all the Democrats' new spending doesn't? Will someone please ask that?
You could afford your house without the government if it weren't for the government.
You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one.
If we're so cruel to minorities, why do they keep coming here? Why aren't they sneaking across the Mexican border to make their way to the Taliban? -- Ann Coulter
In the corporeal world, international law is whatever the United States and Great Britain say it is. -- Ann Coulter
The Great Satan is wearying of this reverse hegemony, in which little pipsqueak nations try to impose their pipsqueak values on us. Aren't we the ones who should be arrogantly oppressing countries that unaccountably do not have the death penalty? -- Ann Coulter
Before the New York Times starts running "Portraits in Grief" of former Enron employees, it's worth remembering that even after the collapse, Enron stock is still worth more than the entire Social Security "trust fund." -- Ann Coulter
The only beef Enron employees have with top management is that management did not inform employees of the collapse in time to allow them to get in on the swindle. If Enron executives had shouted, "Head for the hills!" the employees might have had time to sucker other Americans into buying wildly over-inflated Enron stock. Just because your boss is a criminal doesn't make you a hero. -- Ann Coulter
Have we been cryptic? Right-wingers said Clinton was a lying, unscrupulous traveling salesman. It turned out he was a lying, unscrupulous traveling salesman. Now liberals scratch their heads demanding to know: So what was it about him you didn't like? -- Ann Coulter
I have to say I'm all for public flogging. One type of criminal that a public humiliation might work particularly well with are the juvenile delinquents, a lot of whom consider it a badge of honor to be sent to juvenile detention. And it might not be such a cool thing in the 'hood to be flogged publicly -- Ann Coulter
The swing voters---I like to refer to them as the idiot voters because they don't have set philosophical principles. You're either a liberal or you're a conservative if you have an IQ above a toaster -- Ann Coulter
The (New York) Times editorial page is like a Ouija board that has only three answers, no matter what the question. The answers are: higher taxes, more restrictions on political speech and stricter gun control -- Ann Coulter
I don't know. Have liberals seen our guys? Engaging in mind-boggling acts of heroism makes our brave servicemen happy. Camel-riding nomads may excel at the sucker punch, but wait until they see Western Civilization's response. As pilot "Elvis" said on MSNBC the other night, "We'll do the job." So I wouldn't worry too much about the redoubtable Taliban forces. We're sending in men, not Washington Post columnists. -- Ann Coulter
Not exactly smashing stereotypes of liberals as mincing pantywaists, the left's entire contribution to the war effort thus far has been to whine. -- Ann Coulter
The Afghan "negotiation phase" immediately precedes the traditional Afghan "surrender phase." This entails the following: The defeated party surrenders and then comes out shooting. This is repeated several times. Finally, the vanquished party runs out of ammunition and is forced to surrender – but seriously this time – at which point the victors kill the foreigners and hug their fellow Afghans like long-lost brothers. -- Ann Coulter
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Communist China has everything to gain by having North Korea go nuclear, and as such would act as a distraction, thus keeping the U.S. busy and allowing Communist China to take back the Island Nation of Taiwan.
China will never be a faithful partner with Japan and America in keeping North Korea in check.
Alone, North Korea even with a nuclear weapon is no real threat to the United States or even Japan. Common scense should prevail and the Leaders of North Korea would have to know that the United States could turn them into a vast wasteland with our weapon capabilities. But that is where Communist China comes in and their closest ally inside of American Politics...Bill and Hillary Clinton!
Bill "BJ" Clinton after all, repaid the Communists for their genorous donations to his re-election campaign by giving them the technology needed to target their missles at our shores.
North Korea also in its need for money to feed its starving people could also sell a nuclear weapon to some schmuck in al-Queada to be used in Israel or the U.S.
Either way, Communist China is not going to help us with this problem...We will probably have to go this one alone also.
Monday, May 09, 2005
Sunday, May 08, 2005
Saturday, May 07, 2005
The ad reads: "7 1/2 inch link bracelet with Keep Abortion Legal round charm and lobster closure. Silvertone finish over solid brass, packaged in drawstring pouch." Its price is listed as $11.95.
Imagine going to your mom and saying, "Happy Mothers Day, thanks for giving life to me, here is your KEEP ABORTION ALIVE bracelet."
Just who in the hell is that ignorant and that hateful toward life that they would even consider giving this piece of crap as a gift to someone that you love and adore.
Now remember, these are the same feminazi bitches that remained silent about Domestic Violence during the OJ Simpson trial, and defended the womanizing and predetorial sexual antics of the former President, Bill "Blow Job" Clinton. And stood by muzzled during the Terri Schiavo execution by her husband.
Just what do these NAGS at NOW do to defend women anyway beside the right to kill a baby whenever and wherever they so desire.
Go to any school in America, you cannot give a kid an asprin but the feminazis at NOW want to strip parents of their rights and let a stranger take your daughter across state lines and kill her unwanted baby without your consent and or knowledge.
And still, these so called defenders of Womens Rights have only condemnd President Bush and he has done more to liberate oppressed and abused women in 5 years then NOW has done in its entire existence.
I sincerly wish all you mothers out there a very Happy Mothers Day!
PA Academic on PA TV: Killing of Jews is Mandatory: By Itamar Marcus & Barbara Crook, December 27, 2004
Much media attention has been given in recent weeks to a reported "drop" in PA incitement. Unfortunately, while there have been some changes in PA TV, the same hate messages continue to be espoused -- just by different speakers.
For example, world attention has brought pressure on the PA to change the content of the Friday sermons, in which religious leaders have repeatedly called for the genocide of Jews. The PA has not eliminated the message, however, but has merely transferred it to another framework.
For years, the PA religious establishment has repeatedly portrayed the killing of Jews as a religious necessity. Today, PA TV chose to rebroadcast this same call to genocide as a historical necessity -- this time from a senior PA academic rather than from a religious leader. Dr. Hassan Khater, founder of the Al Quds Encyclopedia and a TV lecturer, cited the identical Hadith - Islamic tradition attributed to Mohammed - that the religious leaders have used to demand this genocide. This was part of a lecture focusing on what he described as the war of the Jews against Palestinian trees.
These were his words quoting the Hadith:
"Mohammed said in his Hadith: 'The Hour [Day of Resurrection] will not arrive until you fight the Jews, [until a Jew will hide behind a rock or tree] and the rock and the tree will say: Oh Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'" PA TV Dec. 27, 2004 [Rebroadcast from July 13, 2003]
The continued teaching that this Hadith applies today could well be a dominant factor driving terror against Israeli civilians. By depicting redemption as dependent on Muslims' killing of Jews, the PA world view presents this genocide as a religious obligation and historical necessity -- not related to the conflict over borders, but as something inherent to Allah's world.
Sheik Ibrahim Madiras Friday sermon, PA TV Sept. 10, 2004:
"The Prophet said: the Resurrection will not take place until the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims kill them. The Muslims will kill the Jews, rejoice [in it], rejoice in Allah's Victory. The Muslims will kill the Jews, and he will hide.
The Prophet said: the Jews will hide behind the rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: oh servant of Allah, oh Muslim this is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!. Why is there this malice? Because there are none who love the Jews on the face of the earth: not man, not rock, and not tree everything hates them. They destroy everything they destroy the trees and destroy the houses. Everything wants vengeance on the Jews, on these pigs on the face of the earth, and the day of our victory, Allah willing, will come."
Friday, May 06, 2005
As a protest and not one for wanting to be accused of being a hipocrit by allowing google to use space on this blog site for adveritising purposes that allows it to give money to the socialist left also known as the Democratic Party, I am withdrawing ads and the Google search engine on this blog.
Earlier this week, a conservative political action committee charged Google with bias in its advertising policies when an ad criticizing Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was rejected, though it included the same verbiage as an ad previously posted on Google attacking Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.
Later, in a lame attempt to cover their asses, Google reps stated that neither ad should have been run....A little too late for that apology!
It has become a dark day now that we have to label a internet search engine as being on the socialist leftwing party of the Democrats or the Right wing party of the Republicans.
In addition, earlier this week,it was reported by WorldNetDaily.com that Google has announced it is getting ready to begin ranking news searches by "quality rather than simply by their date and relevance to search times," giving preference to big news agencies such as CNN and the Associated Press – both news organizations that have been criticized for pro-Democrat bias.
Google is the operating company that supports blogger.com. How long till they start censoring bloggers and their content could they refuse to allow blogs such as mine and many others who refuse to fall into the socialist communist trap of the Democratic party?
Google has also banned ads from a religious group because it opposed homosexuality, one of the lefts base support groups because Google deemed it "hate speech". Though Google, the popular Internet search site, claims to uphold its corporat motto "Don't be evil," it allows advertising for what many would consider blatant evil:Homosexual videos featuring anal sex.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
Protector of widows and father for the fatherless
Please be not silent and show no restraint
on behalf of the Jewish blood that has been spilled like water.
But grant perfect rest on the wings of Your Divine Presence
In the lofty abode of the holy, pure and valiant
who shine as the brightness of the heavens
to the souls of our brothers and sisters
Six million Jewish
men, women and children
Who were put to death, slaughtered, burned,
starved, buried alive
Or who suffered other forms of unnatural death
at the hands of the accursed Nazis
and their associates - may their name be wiped out!
In Auschwitz, Treblinka, Maydanek, Malthausen
and in other death camps in Europe
And who gave up their lives in order to Sanctify God's name.
Because we are at one with their memory
and we pray for the elevation of their souls
Their resting place shall be in the Garden of Eden.
Therefore, shall the Master of mercy care for them
under the protection of His wings for all time
And bind their souls in the bond of everlasting life.
O Earth! Do not conceal their blood
and let there not be a resting place for their cry
In their merit shall the remnant of Israel
return to its rightful place
And as for the holy ones, their righteousness
shall be in front of the Lord as an everlasting memory
They will come in peace and will rest in peace
They will meet their rightful destiny at the end of days
and let us say Amen.
The Holocaust is the term used to refer to the period from 1933 to 1945, before and during World War II, when Adolf Hitler and the Nazis systematically persecuted and murdered nearly six million Jews. More than one third of the World Jewry, as well as another five million non-Jews throughout Europe, were killed during this period. The genocide, or what the Nazis dubbed "The Final Solution," occurred mainly at six death camps located in Poland.
A Day of Commemoration for Those Who Perished
In 1951, the Israeli Knesset declared that the 27th day of Nisan is to be Yom HaShoah, or Holocaust Remembrance Day, a day of commemoration for the Jews who perished and for those who showed resistance and heroism during the Holocaust. The day is the anniversary of the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto uprising.
Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust Remembrance Authority
As part of a continuing effort to honor the victims of the Holocaust, Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Authority, was established in 1953 by the Knesset. Yad Vashem also oversees the world-wide Holocaust memorial, "Unto Every Person There Is a Name," a unique project designed to perpetuate the memory of the Jewish victims of the Holocaust by public recitation of their names on the Day of Remembrance.
This is the way addled liberals really think. Even as they champion sucking the brains out of little babies, they think of themselves as indelibly compassionate because they favor an overweening, behemoth federal government. -- Ann Coulter
Lawyer Alan Dershowitz is promoting the adoption of a national ID card. Liberals are stalwart defenders of civil liberties -- provided we're only talking about criminals. -- Ann Coulter
We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States. -- Ann Coulter
Liberals compare Jerry Falwell to the Taliban, but then are furious with George Bush for not being Jesus Christ. Evidently, what a president is supposed to do when the girls are scared is develop complete omniscience and omnipotence. Thus, the media repeatedly expound upon the proposition that what Bush should have done in response to the anthrax mailings is: Instantly produce the culprits and put an end to this madness! -- Ann Coulter
Liberal soccer moms are precisely as likely to receive anthrax in the mail as to develop a capacity for linear thinking. -- Ann Coulter
Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening. -- Ann Coulter
Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy. -- Ann Coulter
We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed too. Otherwise they will turn out to be outright traitors. -- Ann Coulter
The only rich people deserving of malice are rich liberals who express bemusement at the non-rich's desire for a tax cut -- Ann Coulter
The infernal flag-waving after 9/11 nearly drove liberals out of their gourds. For the left, 'flag-waving' is an epithet. -- Ann Coulter
Big Government / Democrats
Democrats are channeling their frustration with America's imminent military victory in Afghanistan into hysterical opposition to reasonable national security measures at home. (Incidentally, this ought to prove once and for all what a bunch of paper tigers the Russians are. What were they doing over there for 10 years? It hasn't taken us 10 weeks.) -- Ann Coulter
Fortunately, Congress has no role in prosecuting this war either abroad or domestically. They are relieved of duty, free to "get back to normal," as the president has recommended – which in their case means enacting massive spending bills to fund comically useless government programs. That should make them happy. -- Ann Coulter
When we were at peace, Democrats wanted to raise taxes. Now there's a war, so Democrats want to raise taxes. When there was a surplus, Democrats wanted to raise taxes. Now that there is a mild recession, Democrats want to raise taxes. There is perennially some sector of the economy Teddy Kennedy is longing to socialize and this, too, will require raising taxes. -- Ann Coulter
Taxes are like abortion, and not just because both are grotesque procedures supported by Democrats. You're for them or against them. Taxes go up or down; government raises taxes or lowers them. But Democrats will not let the words "abortion" or "tax hikes" pass their lips. Which one was an "investment in our future" and which one is a "choice"? Was that killing babies or taking our money? -- Ann Coulter
Hearing politicians tell us "we" can't "afford" a tax cut is like listening to a glutton tell you he can't "afford" a diet. In no other context do people talk about "paying for" money they don't have. I can't pay for your refusal to give me money because I need a yacht. -- Ann Coulter
Ed "The Truth Is Illegal" Markey responded to Teamster support for ANWR by dismissively sniffing, it was only "one issue." Luckily, the Democrats have all those other issues dear to the heart of the average blue-collar worker: abortion on demand, gay marriage and taxpayer-funded crucifixes submerged in urine. -- Ann Coulter
There will be more quotes by this most intelligent woman in the future. You can read her column at DrudgeReport.com or at www.anncoulter.com