Sunday, March 12, 2006


The following article about Military recruiters on college campuses was written and submitted by a very good friend of mine who goes by, The LoneWatchman.

He has proudly served in our military and gave up time from his friends and family to stand guard over the Islamofacists douchebags that are housed at Club Gitmo. I do hope that someday he writes something describing what he saw and heard while performing his duties on the American side of the Island nation of Cuba.

Last week the Supreme Court ruled that colleges had to allow military recruiters on campus or lose federal funding. This ruling didn’t seem to get all that much attention, and what it did get was usually framed as John Roberts leading the right wing of the S.C. into judicial activism. Of course that perception is warped, since not only was it a unanimous opinion, but it also failed to set up an even bigger activist position for the Court to assume. I suspect the reason why there was little coverage of the ruling is simply because it’s very hard to say it was a vast right wing conspiracy when non-conservative judges decided the same thing. What is missing here though, is that no one seems to be giving the conservatives credit for not being activists on this issue. If the conservative judges had ruled in opposition, and had the numbers to make it matter, they would have set the stage to cause raining money over Hillsdale, Liberty U, and Wheaton College.

The original colleges, law schools, that brought this case to the Supreme Court contended that it was a violation of free speech and association to force them to accept military recruiters or lose federal funding. These schools didn’t want recruiters present because they claim to object to the discriminatory “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy of the military (a policy enacted by Bill Clinton, a liberal lawyer). Certainly we could argue about if that reason is true or not, and what else might be behind it, but that is not the issue at the moment. Let’s take a look at this idea of the First Amendment and federal funding from a few different angles.

Hillsdale college is unique because it does not accept federal funding at all, so that it does not have to accept government interference in the way in which it’s leaders operate the school. Let’s say for instance the government started to require that all funded schools must have an affirmative action program, not just an equal opportunity policy, but a program to give preference to some students based on color. This of course would be discriminatory against any student who did not fall into this group, would these law schools still have thought that a college that didn’t support the government mandate be funded? Would the type of discrimination change how the funding question was answered?

Other colleges are “religious” and cannot get much government funding if any at all simply because of their beliefs, which is discrimination. Some people would argue that it’s separation of church and state to not send tax money to religious schools. This is where the constitutional conflict comes in, if not funding a school because of their beliefs is a violation of speech and association, how can that be resolved with religious schools? How can one part of the constitutional be used to deny some schools, while other parts of it ensure, (in law school theory) a college can hold to any belief it wants and not lose funding? How do we decide which rights are trump, and which protections affect which groups at which times? This is the constitutional crisis the conservatives could have caused if they actually were activists, and had the numbers, but they didn’t either way. There could have been a battle that would have resulted in all schools getting funding without having to compromise their beliefs and yet people still would not be happy. It is really not the federal government’s job to be involved with education anyway.

To my mind the government could give out grants, scholarships, and loans, but should not be concerned with which school the student is attending. This time it seems big government has bitten the liberals in the butt, though they may get the last laugh when the Army starts stacking it’s J.A.Gs with anti-American socialists.

Saturday, March 11, 2006


Now that Portgate is all but faded from our memory, the Liberal Left will now feel the need to heal the hurt feelings between the United States and the Arab/Islamofacist world, and even though they sided with most Americans on this issue (Big Surprise), I am quite sure that they will blame the President for such a racist act as discriminating against an Arab nation, and the Mainstream media will eat it up with their usual dirty spoon.

The President has already moved on to other matters by referring to Iran and it's Hitleresque President a "Grave National Security Issue".

No shit Sherlock! Where have you been all of these weeks?

Just a day ago, the President was trying to shove a deal down our throats saying that the UAE, who by the way crave the destruction of the Jewish State of Israel, were our friends and ally. Now the President does an about face and turns into a half hearted hawk again.

All the while we stand around with our thumbs up our asses waiting for Diplomacy to solve the Nuclear question that Iran is eagerly seeking a decisive answer to, the Shiite Head clerics and the lunatic President of Iran who sees himself as a Messiah of some sorts are building and readying themselves for what is sure to be a War!

President Bush needs to get a clue right now! These whack jobs in Iran, the Mullahs and their Hitler like dictator want to kill Americans and destroy Israel! No ifs, ands, or buts about it! Their goal is as plain as the ugly on Janet Reno's face.

Iran declared war against the United States in 1979 when Jimmy Carter displayed his lack of leadership as our President at the time. We have yet to do anything about that threat of war.

The same way that Saddam used "Diplomacy" as a way to stall and win time to evacuate his WMD into Syria with the help of our friends the Russians, (Friends indeed) the Iranian nut jobs are doing the same thing.

As we sit here in our comfy home in the U.S., our soldiers are dealing with attacks from Iran every day in Iraq. The Improvised Explosive Devices that kill Americans and Iraqis every day in terror attacks are more then likely made in Iran and transported over the border to be used against our soldiers.

Israel is even getting sick of the United States hemming and hawing their way through this and are prepared to take matters into their own hands if neccessary.

In the early afternoon hours of Sunday, June 7, 1981, Israeli pilots took off from an air base in the south of Israel. The mini-armada consisted of eight F-16s, each carrying two 2,000-pound bombs, and six F-15s flying in a protective umbrella.

In less than two minutes' time, these 14 planes of the Israeli Air Force laid waste to the Osiraq nuclear reactor on the outskirts of Baghdad.

The United States reacted much the way the Israeli leadership thought it would. The Reagan Administration voted to condemn Israel in the U.N. and four F-16s scheduled for shipment to Israel were held back a few weeks. Behind the scenes, however, President Reagan assured Israel of his continued support.

One could be led to believe that the same thing could happen very, very soon. And any attack led by Israel would more then likely have the support of the United States. Unless of course a Democrat is in office much like Jimmy Carter was in 1979 when he turned his back on a American friendly leadership that was in place in Iran and instead ALLOWED a hostile anti-American Islamic Fundamentalist regime to take over.

The Soviets don't realize that a nuclear Iran could be as dangerous for them as it is for the US and Israel, even western Europe. Same appeasment bullshit as with Iraq before the war. Russia has had its own problems with Islamofacist loonies in the Chechyn region and don't think for a moment that Iran would not turn and bite the hand that fed it nuclear material to begin with in favor of Islamic Fundamentalist who want to further their dream of a world wide Islamic government.

We need to act now along side our Jewish friends in Israel. If we stand by and let Iran destroy Israel as Jimmy Carter would do, then who is to say that we here in the U.S.A. would not be next.

No nation building, no spreading of Democracy, none of that crap...Let's just get the job done and waste the F--ing F---kers and send them on a one way magic carpet ride to Paradise and the 72 virgins. In plain english, "Let's waste em!" "Kill em all and let G-d sort em out!" I am sure that we would not be wrong on this one.

With threats like, "The west will suffer" and promising "Harm and Pain" to Americans and Israel, how can we sit by with our heads in the sand and think for one minute that this can be solved with diplomacy. Diplomacy works only when both sides are thinking rationally. The Iranian President is obviously not a rational person and neither are the Islamic Clerics and Mullahs who desire the destruction of America and Israel and send their sons and daughters out with bombs strapped to themselves on suicidal missions to kill innocent civilians. Jews, Muslims, Christians alike have died because of these homocidal maniacs.

I desire a peaceful world to live in as much as the next guy. But being the rational and logical thinking person that I am makes me realize that to have peace, one needs to wage war at times.

In the meantime, in my own little way, I have created a message to the President of Iran and his cult like followers of Religious zealots and IslamoNazi Pig F--king whores.

Have a wonderful weekend.

The Rogue Jew!

Friday, March 10, 2006


Politicians note: Visible backbone -- Wafa Sultan.
Arab-American psychologist Wafa Sultan was on Al-Jazeera TV and dished out some good licks on the usual Islamic apologists looking to denounce America. The clip has been viewed over a million times on MEMRI!

You have GOT TO love this woman:

Dr. Ibrahim Al-Khouli: "Are you a heretic?"

Wafa Sultan: "You can say whatever you like. I am a secular human being who does not believe in the supernatural..."

Dr. Ibrahim Al-Khouli: "If you are a heretic, there is no point in rebuking you, since you have blasphemed against Islam, the Prophet, and the Koran..."

Wafa Sultan: "These are personal matters that do not concern you."


"Brother, you can believe in stones, as long as you don't throw them at me. You are free to worship whoever you want, but other people's beliefs are not your concern, whether they believe that the Messiah is God, son of Mary, or that Satan is God, son of Mary. Let people have their beliefs."


"The Jews have come from the tragedy [of the Holocaust], and forced the world to respect them, with their knowledge, not with their terror; with their work, not with their crying and yelling. Humanity owes most of the discoveries and science of the 19th and 20th centuries to Jewish scientists. Fifteen million people, scattered throughout the world, united and won their rights through work and knowledge. We have not seen a single Jew blow himself up in a German restaurant. We have not seen a single Jew destroy a church. We have not seen a single Jew protest by killing people. The Muslims turned three Buddha statues into rubble. We have not seen a single Buddhist burn down a mosque, kill a Muslim, or burn down an embassy. Only the Muslims defend their beliefs by burning down churches, killing people, and destroying embassies. This path will not yield any results. The Muslims must ask themselves what they can do for humankind, before they demand that humankind respect them."

We can add nothing to this. Ms. Gabriel lived in the very midst of Muslim society in Lebanon:

I was ten years old when my home exploded around me burying me under the rubble, drinking my blood to survive as the perpetrators shouted Allah Akbar. My only crime was that I was a Christian living in a Christian town.

I learned at 10 years old the meaning of the word "infidel." . . . At the age of thirteen I dressed in my burial clothes going to bed at night waiting to be slaughtered and by the age of 20 I had buried most of my friends who were killed by Muslims. We were not Americans living in New York, or Britons in London, we were Arab Christians living in Lebanon.

. . . Simply put, they hate me and you because we are defined in their eyes by one simple word, "infidels." Under the banner of Islam . . . , they murdered Jewish children in Israel, massacred Christians in Lebanon, killed Copts in Egypt, Assyrians in Syria, Hindus in India, and expelled almost 900,000 Jews out of Muslim lands. We Middle Eastern infidels paid the price then and for their indifference and shortsightedness infidels worldwide are paying the price now.

. . . Political correctness is the shackles around our ankles by which Islamists are leading us to our demise.

America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam. You hear about Wahabbi and Salafi Islam as the only extreme form of Islam. All the other Muslims are wonderful moderates. I hope the pictures of the irrational eruption of violence from around the world in reaction to the cartoons of Mohammed from burning embassies, to calls to butcher those who mock Islam, or to warnings to be prepared for the real holocaust, has given you a glimpse into the real face of the enemy. The news pictures and video of these events represents a canvas of hate decorated by different nationalities who share one common ideology of hate, bigotry and intolerance derived from one source. Authentic Islam. An Islam that is awakening from centuries of slumber to re-ignite its wrath against the infidel and dominate the world. An Islam which has declared "Intifada" on the West.


Dubai Ports backed down yesterday on their attempt to control United States ports, vowing to turn over control to a US owned company amid reports that both houses were willing to over turn any veto that President Bush promised on a bill to stop the Arab company from taking over control of major sea ports in the US.

"DP World will transfer fully the U.S. operations ... to a United States entity," H. Edward Bilkey, the company's top executive, said in the surprise announcement that seemed to spread relief throughout the Capitol and the White House. It was unclear which American business might get the port operations.

Just hours earlier, Republican House and Senate leaders privately told the president that Congress was all but certain to block DP World's plan. Under pressure from a disapproving public, a House committee overwhelmingly voted against it Wednesday. The leaders told Bush the Senate would inevitably do the same, despite his threats to veto any legislation killing the deal.

But alas, the United Arab Emirates expressed anger at congress for taking US security interests before monetary or whatever hand holding/ass kissing appeasment deal the President made with the arab nation.

What, that can't Arab nation pissed off at the United States? The UAE will be forced to the back of the line on that one.

Dubai is threatening retaliation against American strategic and commercial interests if Washington blocks its $6.8 billion takeover of operations at several U.S. ports.

A source close to the deal said members of Dubai’s royal family are furious at the hostility both Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have shown toward the deal.

“They’re saying, ‘All we’ve done for you guys, all our purchases, we’ll stop it, we’ll just yank it,’” the source said.

I wonder if the Clintons will still get payed by their foreign friends? The two have them have their hands extremely dirty in this one. Hillary claims to be against the deal, but we all know she has lied before. How can you tell Hillary is lying, you ask? When she opens her mouth!

A source close to the deal said members of Dubai’s royal family are furious at the hostility both Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have shown toward the deal.

I have to wonder just who the hell the President is working for anyway? A huge majority of Americans were against this deal, yet he still wanted to go thru with it. Why would the President who has at the very least, portrayed himself as a national security hawk want to give himself the image of a "Limp dick Democrat" in a major election year when a large number of Republican congressional and senate seats are up for re-election this year. Republicans in both houses had no other choice but to stand against the President this time.

I'm just waiting to see if Bush/Cheney have the balls to let Halliburton be the company that takes over the ports.

All the while this was going on, I couldn't believe my ears when I heard Rush Limbaugh actually defend this deal. It was Michael Savage and his radio show, "The Savage Nation" that really opened up the eyes of Americans as to how wrong "PortGate" really was for America...The Rogue Jew salutes a true patriot, Michael Savage for doing so!

The President of course was guilty this time of pulling the race card, saying that Americans were discriminating against the Arab run company..."Your right Mr. President!" How far out of the realm of reality has the President become? I think that the time his father and Bubba have been spending together is clouding his mind. "Reality check Mr. President. It was Arabs/Muslims/Islamofacists that attacked the United States."

Thursday, March 09, 2006


With all of the money that Anti-War/Attention Whore/MSM Slut for hire, Cindy Sheehan has made by exploiting the death of her son, United States Army Specialist Casey Sheehan, you would think that this grieving dirt bag of a mom would have had the decency to honor the son she claims to have loved so much a Memorial Marker for his grave...WRONG!!!

Sheehan has benifited from the $250,000 military life insurance policy that she collected from the government that she despises, she has received many thousands of dollars worth of gifts from her handlers and liberal supporters. She went out and bought for herself a brand new VolkWagon Beetle convertable, but yet strangly eneough, she has failed to honor the son from whose death has brought her fame and fortune with a simple headstone for his grave. For two years his grave has sat without a memorial headstone.

But alas, in Crawford County Texas where Cindy Sheehan found her street corner in life to peddle her wares as a hooker would peddle her ass, there sits a memorial to Cindy herself. A memorial to her ever growing ego and shrinking moral fortitude.

She has used your son's death to promote herself as a caring mother, but in the process, has abandoned her surviving children and her husband in exchange for fame and fortune and the life of a rock star. Some day we will find a collapsed mother Sheehan in the Betty Ford Rehab Clinic in a bed between Jennifer Lopez and George C-Looney in the newly built Attention Addiction Wing funded in part by Babs Streisand and P-Diddy Sean whats his name.

The Rogue Jew

Wednesday, March 08, 2006


The Clintons pass in the night
By Dick Morris Bill and Hillary Clinton are the first couple to appear simultaneously and independently on the national political stage. They are using their special circumstances as a convenient shield for one another, fulfilling, at once, Hillary's dream of no accountability and Bill's of being able to take both sides of an issue.

Did Hillary know that Bill was pardoning the FALN terrorists to help her win Puerto Rican votes in New York? Oh, she was opposed to the pardon.

Did Hillary find out that Bill was granting pardons to felons and drug dealers who had hired her brothers for six-figure fees to lobby her husband for pardons right under her nose? No way. In fact she was "saddened" at her brothers' involvement.

And we all know that Hillary was "gasping for breath" when she first learned the truth about Monica Lewinsky.

And the former first lady was "bewildered" that members of the White House staff would treat her demands that they fire the travel-office staff as an order.

Bill has been out there criticizing the war while Hillary plays to the center by voting for it.

And now, this heavy-footed pas de deux straddles the issue of whether a Dubai company should run six American ports.

Are we truly to believe Hillary's insistence last week that she knew nothing about Bill's counseling of his friend and benefactor the crown prince of Dubai, Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum, on the ports deal? Do Bill and Hillary Clinton ever speak to each other, or do they just attend funerals, fundraisers and Billy Graham crusades together for photo-ops?


Tuesday, March 07, 2006


The Rogue Jew would like to post a insincere apology for my part in the Mohammad Cartoon fiasco!


Oh come on now.....You didn't really think I was serious did you? Silly wabbit, Muhammad is for murderous, blood thirsty killers!

The Rogue Jew supports the Danish people and their right to Free Speech. I'm eating a Danish. Denmark Rocks!


Current and former screeners with information about Wade urged to come forward

Major General William H. Wade II was nominated for Adjutant General, the top post at the California Army National Guard. Although Wade's confirmation hearing has not yet been scheduled, the California Senate Rules Committee is accepting information from individuals who endorse or oppose his confirmation.

Wade is the former TSA Federal Security Director at Sacramento International Airport, where he endured controversy among screeners there during his tenure. A number of TSA screeners who worked under Wade have information about him that may be of interest to Senate Rules Committee members.
"Anyone has the right to come forward and provide information about him that they think we should consider," Nettie Sabelhaus, Appointments Director for the California State Senate.

That right extends to those screeners who suffered abuse or wrongdoing under Wade's administration, and anecdotal evidence suggests that there are quite a few of them.

Wade's Post-9/11 Assignment

Wade took command of the Army National Guard's airport security function -- dubbed Joint Task Force Aerosafe (JTFAS) -- in October, 2001, following the terrorist attacks of 9/11. He was also Oakland Airport’s General Manager, according to a news report.

Before they were deployed, guard personnel underwent a "comprehensive Federal Aviation Administration training program" and received "federal law enforcement training to include conflict management and resolution, as well as additional weapons handling safety procedures," according to one news article.

The National Guard troops were withdrawn at the end of April, 2002, under a security directive by the newly formed TSA.

"That security directive instructs the airport authorities to have in place with the TSA by the 30th of this month a memorandum of agreement under which the airport will arrange for uniformed police officers -- trained, sworn deputies -- to take the place of the National Guard at the security checkpoints," said Paul Turk, TSA spokesman in Washington.

Wade Hired by TSA

Taking advantage of his new contacts and experience in the airport security business, Wade applied for a position with the TSA and on August 2 2002 was appointed Federal Security Director for Sacramento International Airport by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta.

"These experienced professionals will be on the front lines in the war on terrorism and are integral in furthering the (TSA's) commitment to first-class security and first-class customer service," Secretary Mineta said in a press release.

Soon after the TSA began active service during the "roll-out" at Sacramento airport in September of 2002, TSA employees working under Wade started to learn what sort of leader he was.

Wade Shows His Darker Side

Yelling at employees, failing to direct proper investigations of complaints, retaliating against employees who file EEO complaints, submitting false statements in response to a Congressional inquiry, losing paperwork related to workers comp claims and promotion applications, attempted intimidation of employees and their spouses, inappropriate and offensive comments about African American and gay employees, and more happened under Wade, say screeners who worked at Sacramento.

"That entire meeting was a farce," said one former TSA employee who attended one of the Town Hall meetings. "I heard these remarks and even another which was just as outrageous."

A number of TSA employees filed Equal Employment Opportunity complaints with the TSA's Office of Civil Rights while Wade held his Senior Executive position with the agency, and others submitted complaints to Internal Affairs, to Wade's management and other agencies.

Not all of the complaints directly named then FSD Wade, but Wade was the top management official at the airport and was thus involved in or at least aware of most if not all of the complaints.

Some screeners have said that Wade and his senior managers ran an incompetent administration at Sacramento airport, losing important documents such as promotion applications, resumes, and even forms needed by the Department of Labor for workers compensation claims.

Rock bottom morale has been blamed for the airport's high turnover rate of TSA screeners. "It doesn't surprise me at all that people are leaving there," said one former TSA employee. "I am still hopeful that one day, it will all be brought out in the open."

Wade's administration has also been accused of actively working to get complaints thrown out by providing statements to senior TSA officials designed to discredit the complainants, failing to properly investigate complaints against other employees, and even providing false statements to a Senator in response to a Congressional Inquiry.

Sworn testimony by TSA managers at Sacramento, provided during depositions conducted as part of one EEO case, have corroborated some of the complaints. False statements by Wade, mismanaging an investigation, losing Workers Comp and other documents were all verified by members of former FSD Wade's staff.

The TSA management at Sacramento Airport was characterized as "incompetent" by one union attorney familiar with at least one EEO complaint against the agency. That case was settled by the TSA shortly after local management officials illegally placed the pregnant employee on Leave Without Pay for being placed on a "light duty" status by her physician due to a high risk pregnancy.

Airport and Airline Officials Also Unhappy With Wade

TSA employees weren't the only ones unhappy with Wade. According to a newspaper article published last year, Sacramento Airport head Acree complained about Wade in a letter to Washington, D.C., in January, 2003. The letter complained that federal representatives were "dogmatic, domineering and uninterested in partnership."

The hard feelings were mutual according to documents, said the article.

Bill Wade sent an e-mail to Frances Sherertz, the airport operations director, telling him "Frankly, I'm fed up with the name-calling, the finger-pointing, the lack of cooperation, ad infinitum. Everything with this airport and the carriers is an exercise in futility."

A review of documents and interviews with airport and federal employees, there were a number of disagreements between Wade's office and the airport and airlines.

One such disagreement involved who would be required to carry luggage from the bomb-detection machine in the lobby to the baggage conveyor belt. For some time, TSA Screeners were carrying the bags, being told that it was required. "Later," one screener told Screeners Central, "we found out that Wade had made a deal with the airlines." Apparently the policy had nothing to do with TSA ops and everything to do with Wade trying to please the airlines.

"Wade was not a popular guy," said another TSA employee.

TSA Screeners from the "Wade Era" Urged to Come Forward

I encourage anyone with information of wrongdoing or abuse (including current or former TSA employees) while he was the FSD at Sacramento can and should contact the Senate Rules Committee. Personal statements and supporting documents add substance to claims made, according to Sabelhaus.

I will be going to the Capital myself and I would be more than happy to forward your comments and information as well.

If you have information to share with the Senate Rules Committee concerning Wade's nomination, you can contact me by telephone or e-mail to discuss your information. Documents can be sent to me via fax or sent as a PDF file.

Please be sure to include your name with such submissions.


It really is true....Incompetence begins at the top and works its down to the managers and the Federal Security Directors.

"It may be best for Chertoff to get out while the getting is good."

Rumors about Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's resignation started late Friday after he at the last minute canceled his keynote speech at an American Bar Association conference in San Francisco.

The Internet rumors were prompted by both the cancellation and the leak on Thursday of a videotape that showed Chertoff and other DHS staffs' seeming lack of response to the briefing in preparation for Hurricane Katrina. Democrats on Capitol Hill have been calling for Chertoff's resignation for months.

Chertoff has stood tall against the criticism, knowing perhaps that it would be difficult for President Bush to find another Republican willing to take over what many in Washington consider to be the most institutionally troubled agency in the country. This is not Chertoff's fault. If blame should be placed, say White House and other Administration insiders, it should be laid at the feet of former DHS Secretary Tom Ridge, who at no point in the run-up to the creation of the agency said "No" to the way the department was pulled together from various other Cabinet level departments.

"You're pulling agencies and staff from Justice, Treasury, HHS, Agriculture, and who knows from where else," says one former White House staffer who was involved in the planning. "We were warned that many of these different groups had never played well together when they weren't part of the same agency team. But no one at the top seemed to consider that. Now we see the results."

Chertoff was not the first or even the third choice of President Bush to be head of DHS, and many associates were surprised that he gave up a seat on the federal bench to take up a post that was fraught with infighting.

If Chertoff does decide to leave, it will not be because of Katrina, his associates say -- it will be because of the Dubai Port deal, and the failings of the Treasury Department and the White House to properly vet what should have been a DHS decision, pure and simple.

"Instead, this became a multi-agency scrum and things just fell through the cracks," says a current Administration source. "There is more to come out about this deal, and it may be best for Chertoff to get out while the getting is good."

Monday, March 06, 2006


DISCLAIMER: The following story is reported based on reports from unconfirmed sources. You do the math!

Once again the Rogue Jew is on the job sneaking and peaking into the secret world of that government program that is suppose to safeguard Americans who fly the "friendly skies" of our commercial airlines...The Transportation Security Administration, particularly the puss nutted, shit for brains, pencil dicked morons that manage the in-security at the Gerald R. Ford International Airport in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

The big question on everybody's minds these days is if the TSA is about to de-federalize its screening force in Grand Rapids.

My anonomys eyes and ears of the GRR have informed me that last week, while yours truly was hanging and bangin in the Big Apple, those who manage the Screening Force at the Gerald R. Ford held a super duper top secret hush hush meeting with their mindless bunch of supervisors, of which if it wasn't for the TSA they would all probably be flipping burgers at a fast food joint, or selling elephant ears at as a carni in the traveling carnival coming to a county fair near you! Digress I must when it comes to these airheads.

Anyway, at this top secret orgy of incompetence, it is rumored that FSD and AFSD had their FATASS' (Federal Aviation Transportation Airline Screnner Stupidvisors) sign a paper pledging their devotion and solidarity that they would remain on with the Federal Government when the Screeners are de-federalized or as you will, PRIVATIZED.

The current scuttlebutt going round the rumor mill is that the suspected privatization of the Screening force will occur sometime before they are able to draw a retirement so as to save millions of federal tax dollars at the expense of the unsuspecting screener who have been cheated, duped, screwed, and lied too since the day they were hired.

I am quite sure that the TSA Federal Screeners would be offered positions with the new private companies, but I can tell you from experience of having worked for Argenbright Security before and shortly after 9/11 and before the Dept. of Homeland InSecurity took over airline security that their management and supervisors were just as incompetent as the current wad stains that play desk jockey doing absofreakinglutely not a damn thing day to day.

The sad part that remains is that the current orgy of assholes get to keep their federal positions, pensions and exuberant pay to do nothing while some damn good people will be forced to put up with the same crap for less pay and benefits.

Why all of the secrecy you ask? As long as I worked there, the management has always been secretive about everything. Making up rules as they go along, when ever it suited their insensitive needs, being abusive toward the Screeners, having sexual relations with the ones they supervise thus seeing to it she was paid well for her service above and BELOW the call of duty. Incidently this supervisor still has a job and she is on "leave". (I saw him when I flew out. Nice to see ya OJ)

If there is any truth at all to this rumor, then these Federal Screeners are sitting ducks, slaving every single day for a boss who is an ungrateful schmuck who is getting paid BIG DOLLARS and getting all the credit while the Screeners get squat! All the time spent at the airport busting your ass for a retirement that you won't even get!

That's just my opinion....I maybe wrong?

The Rogue Jew


The dis-Honorable Senator from New York and former first lady, Hillary Clinton made claims over the weekend that she had no clue about her husband, former President who was impeached for perjury, Bill "Blow Job" Clinton's misdealings with the UAE an Arab government and it's attempts to control our ports of entry in the United States.

If you believe this heap of bullshit that spewed from the senator's lips, then I have some wonderful ocean front property in Arizona I will sell you for a great price!

The former President Bill Clinton's ties to Dubai and the United Arab Emirates should not have come as a surprise to his New York senator wife.

Mrs Clinton's own senatorial financial disclosure forms reveal that her husband earned $450,000 giving speeches in Dubai in 2002.

Officials from the UAE also donated between $500,000 and $1m to fund Mr Clinton's presidential library in Arkansas.

It was part of an effort by the emirates, said a person close to UAE officials, to forge a close relationship with a former US president who is influential and highly regarded in the region.

Democrats see the revelations about his ties to the UAE as a classic Clinton boondoggle. Mrs Clinton told the New York Post on Thursday that she did not know her husband had been contacted by Dubai officials two weeks ago and offered them advice on the deal. Although both Hillary and Bill Clinton say he stands behind her on the issue and there is no direct conflict, his relationship to the UAE has complicated her political stance on the transaction.

I am quite sure that the former first lady and junior Senator knows at all times what her adulterous, philandering, poor excuse of a husband is up to at all times. Since he got caught with his hand in the panties of a White House intern, and that his past exploits as a scum bag were exposed by other women who came foward with their stories of sexual assault by the former govenor of Arkansas, Hillary probably keeps real close tabs on her schmuck of a husband so that he doesn't do anything to ruin her chances for running as President in 2008.

Besides the fact that Bill's penis seems to cloud his thinking from time to time, a move such as this one, consulting for the UAE for money is classic Clinton greed exposed. Hillary stating she knew nothing about it? That is classic Clinton deception for political gain.

Mrs Clinton has been careful not to criticise the UAE directly, her stance has put her in the same camp as legislators who openly accuse Dubai of helping to finance the September 11 terrorist attacks and deem the UAE untrustworthy. Her two faced way of saying one thing to the voters of the United States while in a closed room, her douchebag husband tells the Arabs as he sells out his country's security not to worry about the old windbag, "It's all taken care of."

While this is all going on and our security as a soverign nation is sent spiraling down the toilet like a turd, I think it's time for me to vomit, for I am so ill as to what is occuring in my own country.

While working for the TSA at the Gerald R. Ford International Airport in Grand Rapids, Michigan I got a bad taste in my mouth as to how much the Federal Government really cares about commercial airline security. Not one damn bit! Now President Bush, the one man many Republicans like myself had faith in, turns his back on the country. Politics as usual.

The only thing that has not surprised me is the fact that Ted Kennedy probably has not sobered up eneough to realize how screwed we are as Americans so that he can give us his input in between martinis and double scotch on the rocks.

May G-d have mercy on us all.
The Rogue Jew

Saturday, March 04, 2006


From NewsMax.Com this story places Bill Clinton at the heart of this mis-deal with this Arab nation.

Former President Bill Clinton is up to his eyeballs in dealings with Dubai, his former top political adviser has revealed. According to Dick Morris, author of the best-selling book, "Condi vs, Hillary,"

Clinton is a paid agent of the crown prince of Dubai, now involved in a firestorm over its deal to take over some of the operations at six major U.S. ports. "Bill Clinton is a senior adviser - a paid adviser - to a company called Ukepa which recently set up a relationship with a group called the Yucaipa Investment group to set up a new company called DIGL," Morris said on "The O'Reilly Factor." "DIGL Inc. is in charge of managing the investments of the crown prince of Dubai throughout the world.

Bill Clinton is paid by Yucaipa a percentage of the profits it makes, and Yucaipa said its profits have exceeded 40 percent in recent years. "He is a paid agent of the crown prince of Dubai. That in addition to the roughly million dollars they gave his library, in addition to the probably $600,000 in speaking fees he got, and in addition to the scholarships for Dubai children they endowed through his library. "

I have three points about that. First, when Bill Clinton tells us this port deal is kosher, he ought to disclose that he's being paid by the government.

Secondly, he should register as an agent of a foreign principal because he's giving public relations advice to a foreign company.

And thirdly, his wife should disclose how much Clinton is being paid and when he's been paid, because it goes into a joint bank account and this is in effect a payment to the husband of a senator. "And then I would raise another question: Didn't Hillary jump out of the box opposing this port deal because she knew of her husband's vulnerability and wanted to get out ahead of the story?

I was talking to a source of mine who's very close to the Clintons about seven or eight months ago and the source said that he's all the time going back and forth to Dubai and getting deeper and deeper into that relationship. She (Hillar) was worried about that and its political impact," Morris said. Morris also had harsh words for President Bush, whom he charged "messed up the Dubai port deal. "He let the opposition discover it. (Sen.) Chuck Schumner broke the story and Bush didn't frame it the way he needed to," Morris said, explaining that he thinks the president simply doesn't care anymore. "I'm getting the impression that he's basically telling (adviser Karl) Rove and the folks, 'Look, I got re-elected, there's not more that I can do to control this. If you want me to go out here for three or four days I will, but I'm not doing it every day, I'm not pounding the pavement like I did for re-election, and I'm taking the long view.'" Morris, one of the nation's top political gurus said that Bush needs to do what Clinton did all through his second term - and even every single day - maintain control of public opinion. Morris warned that a president who drops below 50 percent approval rating for a sustained period of time is in deep trouble. "It's like a no-confidence vote in a parliamentary system - you might as well be out of office." Bush, he said, "has now dropped to a point where Republicans are turning on him, the public is turning on him and all he's got is a portion of the Republican base. And it is going to get worse - he's going to get schlonged in the election of '06, he'll probably have at least one if not two houses (of Congress) controlled by Democrats launching investigations, etc. This is not a pretty picture. He has lost control over public opinion and he has only his own laziness to blame." Morris said that "if the president doesn't understand that if a president loses control of public opinion he loses control of the job." He likened losing control to having your immune system suppressed - you're susceptible to opportunistic infections, like your vice president shoots somebody while hunting, or the Dubai ports thing. That's all a function of decreased popularity."

Thursday, March 02, 2006


Well my loyal readers, The Rogue Jew is back from my trip to the Big Apple...New York City! What a great time we had. Good food, my wonderful in-laws of which my beautiful neice Samantha celebrated her 6th birthday on the 28th. And I got to visit the Jewish homeland away from home! Some time away from the Christian homeland of Grand Rapids was a nice break.

On my trip through airport security. I was able to see some of my friends still plugging away at it despite the incompetent leadership and abuse by management that they endure on a daily basis.

One of my favorite supervisors, (as if!) I'll call him O.J. (You figure it out) handled our bags through the checked baggage screening. He didn't look all to happy to see me. I'm a paying customer now Sgt. Major Dickhead. You actually work for ME! I just looked at him and flashed him my pearly whites.

The supervisor who could pass as a refugee from a 3rd world country who regularly sits downstairs and does his college homework at the expense of taxpayers dollars looked away from me and kept on stepping by. No guts, no glory there Marconi!

Now on to the things that have been really eating at me!

This whole Port thing. I honestly believe that the President has lost his mind. As of this day, I am not a Republican, and I sure in hell am not a Democrat. The Republican party of Ronald Reagan is no more.

President Reagan would have never allowed something as insane as an Arab National run business be in charge of our ports of entry while we are at war with Fundamentalist Islamic nut jobs who believe the pathway to heaven and 72 virgins is by strapping a bomb to ones self and blowing yourself and hundreds of innocent bystanders into a million unidentifiable little peices.

Word to Osama...You want virgins? If you don't mind what they look like, just check out some of the woofer nags that belong to NOW...The National Orgaization for (Ugly) Women. You don't have to blow yourself to get at them, and most of them would be more the happy to service even your camel just to get a man to notice them!

At least when President Clinton spoke, you knew he was full of shit. I actually had faith in President Bush. Was I ever wrong. He is proving himself to be just as big a dumb ass as any other politician.

Let us not forget the whole Clinton connection to this scandalous affair. While Senator Hillary Clinton is talking out her rectum about how wrong this move is for America, her scumbag husband, Former President Bill "Blow Job" Clinton is advising the Arabs how to seal the deal, and to hire a few of his buddies while their at it.

Don't ever flip coins with this gruesome twosome. The Clintons use a coin that has two sphincters instead of two heads. One as big as the other!

And Yet, there is more good news on the Homeland InSecurity front!

In the land of Fruits and Nuts, California, the FBI and whatever dumbass agency is in charge of "Keeping us Safe" allowed an Islamic Terrorist nicknamed " The Next Mohammad Atta" get away.

An official report of the sighting of el-Shukrijumah or his "dead-ringer" was filed with an anti-terrorism unit in Kern County.

The local enforcement officers, including the county sheriff, reportedly neglected to conduct an investigation, despite the $5 million bounty on Shukrijumah's head.

Several federal officials, including U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., when notified of the incident, opted to turn a blind eye to the situation, even though they were aware that the suspect in question has been described as the most dangerous al-Qaida agent on American soil.

After reading THIS, one would think that Osama bin Laden himself was the Secretary of Homeland InSecurity.

Could things become even more f-- up then ever before? We have the Communist Chinese running the Panama canal thanks to former screw up Jimmy Carter, and now courtesy of the Republican party, we will soon have Ahab the Arab Muslim extremist operating our major ports of entry into the United States of America. Talk about letting the fox into the hen house!

And the icing on this cake....The President wants another Arab run company to build parts for the United States military!

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration has opened a national security probe of a second Dubai-owned company amid a political storm over a deal with state-owned Dubai Ports World, The Washington Post reported on Thursday.

The secretive Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is reviewing Dubai International Capital's acquisition of London-based Doncasters Group Ltd., which operates in nine U.S. locations and makes precision parts for U.S. defense contractors, the newspaper reported.

I'll bet that Georgy boy won't be going hunting with Cheney anytime soon at this rate.

It just astounds me that President Bush just does not get it. He has no clue as to who the real enemy in the War on Terror is. His plan of appeasment is no different then that of the French in World War II and that of Jimmy Carter giving in to the Soviet Union and Islamic Shiite Heads in 1979. At this rate, we as free Americans are doomed.

It doesn't matter. Democrats or Republicans. They are all a bunch of shit for brains, pencil dick scum bags. Politics as usual reigns and common sense is DOA...Dead on Arrival!

It's nice to be back....The Rogue Jew!


A reader sent this too me today and I thought I would share it with all my readers. It is from Indepundit.Com Listening to Sheehan get her ass kicked in a public forum is worth the time to listen too it!

The room is packed to capacity with students, professors, and media. Cindy launches into her usual stump speech. War is bad; Bush is a terrorist; bring the troops home now; blah, blah, blah.

Then, foolishly, she takes questions.

MAN: I had a specific question with regards to the memorial you have erected in Crawford, and I believe one that you're going to be doing in Germany. You indicated that you were being supported by Gold Star... Gold Star Families, if I remember correctly. However, there were hundreds of military families that specifically requested that you remove their children's names from the memorial. However, you refused, and they actually had to come out to Crawford to remove them. When you erect memorials in the future, do you plan on using any names, or only names from the families that you have...


MAN: ...received support from.

CINDY SHEEHAN: My organization is Gold Star Families for Peace, and... and your facts aren't correct. We had a few people request that their children’s' names be removed, and if they requested, we removed their names. And.... a memorial in Germany, I don't really... understand what you're talking about.

MAN: You... indicated... I believe it's the family of Derek Lee, which indicated... the mother emailed you specifically, or contacted you specifically, and asked you to remove it, and you told her to come to Crawford.

CINDY SHEEHAN: No, I did not!

MAN: Are you saying that she, in fact, is not telling the truth?

CINDY SHEEHAN: I didn't hear from any mother in Crawford. Number one, I didn't check any email while I was in Crawford. Maybe, somebody who was checking my email, you know, wrote back, but I didn't check my email in Crawford. And I would never, ever, ever go against the wishes of another Gold Star Mother. Ever.

DEBORAH JOHNS: Cindy, my name is Deborah Johns.

CINDY SHEEHAN: Oh. Hi, Deborah, I don't speak for you!

DEBORAH JOHNS: No, you don't.


WOMAN: Aw, crap.

DEBORAH JOHNS: And this gentleman is absolutely correct, because it's Debbie Argel. The Williams... I have over 1200 families that have sent you requests...

CINDY SHEEHAN: Sent me requests? I'm not in charge of those memorials.

DEBORAH JOHNS: ...California, spoke with you personally, on the telephone, and demanded that you stop using her son's name. So did Joe Williams...

CINDY SHEEHAN: I'm not using anybody's son's name.

DEBORAH JOHNS: You have used their names in Crawford, Texas, Cindy. I was there. And I removed their sons' names. And the sheriff down there took the list of the names from me, because he said in the middle of the night, you and your people go back up and put the names back up...


DEBORAH JOHNS: Cindy, you have used their names in the newspaper.

CINDY SHEEHAN: You know what... Deborah, that's not the truth.

DEBORAH JOHNS: You have used their names in the newspaper...

CINDY SHEEHAN: No, I haven't used anybody's name in the newspaper.

DEBORAH JOHNS: USA Today, Cindy...


CINDY SHEEHAN: What... what newspaper have I used their names in?

DEBORAH JOHNS: USA Today, Cindy, when you took out ads across the United States...


CINDY SHEEHAN: ...I can't take that. I'm not the only person who does this stuff...

DEBORAH JOHNS: ...and you know what, you don't speak for me, and you don't speak for the majority...

CINDY SHEEHAN: I never said I spoke for you, Deborah.


CINDY SHEEHAN: I never said I spoke for you. When did I say I spoke for you, Deborah?

DEBORAH JOHNS: Anderson Cooper...

CINDY SHEEHAN: I need to... I need to answer this.

DEBORAH JOHNS: Cindy, Anderson Cooper, when you did an interview, a radio taped interview with Anderson Cooper, when you were in Crawford, Texas, Cindy. You specifically said you were there to ask the questions for "all of America." And you don't speak for me, Cindy, or for the majority of Americans.

(applause, crosstalk)

CINDY SHEEHAN: I need to answer... I need to answer this.

DEBORAH JOHNS: Cindy, you also, you also...

CINDY SHEEHAN: You talked, can I talk now?

DEBORAH JOHNS: I am not finished. You have also made the statement, that our military men and women who don the uniform and carry the weapon are the "ultimate terrorists and murderers..."

CINDY SHEEHAN: Oh my God! I have never said that!

DEBORAH JOHNS: Yes, you did!

CINDY SHEEHAN: Let me answer what you're saying.

DEBORAH JOHNS: ...time and time again...

CINDY SHEEHAN: Let me answer what you're saying.

(grumbling and applause)

WOMAN: Sit down!

MARJORIE COHN: OK, you've made your point, Deborah, and now Cindy's going to respond.

CINDY SHEEHAN: I've never called our military people "terrorists."

DEBORAH JOHNS: Yes, you did...

CINDY SHEEHAN: I have not! And you let me talk!


CINDY SHEEHAN: I never called them "terrorists." My son was in the Army. I love the troops. I support the troops. Their government doesn't support them. They send them over there with defective body armor. They send them over there without the proper training. They send them over there to a mission that makes no sense. Their own... and then when they get back, their own government cuts back the VA funding. Our own government doesn't support them. This is a wrong war. The only way to support them is to get them out of Iraq...


CINDY SHEEHAN: And I would never, ever say that. Whenever I talk about the troops, I say that they are doing the best they can over there under terrible circumstances. Do you know who I call a terrorist? George Bush!


CINDY SHEEHAN: And do you know what? I expect everybody in here to speak for themselves, no matter if their opinions are misinformed, like Deborah's.


CINDY SHEEHAN: We all need to speak for ourselves. And you know what? I am not in charge of any memorials in this country. The Veterans for Peace do memorials, the American Friends Service Committee do memorials. And I would never, ever, tell another Gold Star Mom what to think, how to feel, or how to honor her child's memory.