Check This Out!
Thursday, May 26, 2005
NEVER TRUST A LIBERAL OVER 3!
CLICK ON POST TITLE TO READ THIS ARTICLE FROM THE ARCHIVES OF ANNCOULTER.COM.
REPUBLICANS TELL ARAB LEADERS- U.S. SUPPORTS ISRAEL!
Republicans tell Arab leaders - US supports Israel
Monday, May 23, 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the World Economic Forum conference in Jordan on Saturday, Republican members of the U.S. Congressional delegation were very direct in letting Arab leaders know that the U.S. support of Israel is unwavering.
According to press reports, Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) said the peace process aimed at bringing about an independent Palestinian state is unlikely to win serious backing from the Bush administration without a demonstration of commitment from both sides.
"Until we have someone on the other side who is willing to say 'Yes,' we're not going to continue to prostitute the American presidency to people who aren't serious," said Smith. "It's a mystery to me why Arab countries can't work on their own countries before Palestine is fixed," he added.
"Obviously one of the greatest commitments that we have is to the Jewish people and the state of Israel, to try and manage the difficult process of the peace there and securing that nation, and doing so in a way that, if possible, is just to the Palestinians," Smith told a panel that included Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa, top officials from Jordan, the Palestinian territories, Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as academics from Iran and Turkey.
Asked why the United States was willing to anger Arab countries in favor of Israel, another Congressman, Rep. Christopher Shays, said simply that America is not a neutral player in the Middle East.
"We are Israel's strong ally," Shays, Republican of Connecticut, said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It would be foolish for people to think that somehow we are neutral."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compiled from reports filed by the Associated Press and the Jerusalem Post.
Monday, May 23, 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the World Economic Forum conference in Jordan on Saturday, Republican members of the U.S. Congressional delegation were very direct in letting Arab leaders know that the U.S. support of Israel is unwavering.
According to press reports, Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) said the peace process aimed at bringing about an independent Palestinian state is unlikely to win serious backing from the Bush administration without a demonstration of commitment from both sides.
"Until we have someone on the other side who is willing to say 'Yes,' we're not going to continue to prostitute the American presidency to people who aren't serious," said Smith. "It's a mystery to me why Arab countries can't work on their own countries before Palestine is fixed," he added.
"Obviously one of the greatest commitments that we have is to the Jewish people and the state of Israel, to try and manage the difficult process of the peace there and securing that nation, and doing so in a way that, if possible, is just to the Palestinians," Smith told a panel that included Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa, top officials from Jordan, the Palestinian territories, Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as academics from Iran and Turkey.
Asked why the United States was willing to anger Arab countries in favor of Israel, another Congressman, Rep. Christopher Shays, said simply that America is not a neutral player in the Middle East.
"We are Israel's strong ally," Shays, Republican of Connecticut, said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It would be foolish for people to think that somehow we are neutral."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compiled from reports filed by the Associated Press and the Jerusalem Post.
Bush Country-The Middle East embraces democracy--and the American president.
Opinion Journal
Bush Country - a must-read! (excerpt)
Monday, May 23, 2005 By: Fouad Ajami
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"George W. Bush has unleashed a tsunami on this region," a shrewd Kuwaiti merchant who knows the way of his world said to me. The man had no patience with the standard refrain that Arab reform had to come from within, that a foreign power cannot alter the age-old ways of the Arabs. "Everything here--the borders of these states, the oil explorations that remade the life of this world, the political outcomes that favored the elites now in the saddle--came from the outside. This moment of possibility for the Arabs is no exception." A Jordanian of deep political experience at the highest reaches of Arab political life had no doubt as to why history suddenly broke in Lebanon, and could conceivably change in Syria itself before long. "The people in the streets of Beirut knew that no second Hama is possible; they knew that the rulers were under the gaze of American power, and knew that Bush would not permit a massive crackdown by the men in Damascus."
My informant's reference to Hama was telling: It had been there in 1982, in that city of the Syrian interior, that the Baathist-Alawite regime had broken and overwhelmed Syrian society...
CLICK ON THE POST TITLE TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE THAT YOU WILL NOT FIND IN THE MAINSTREAM PRESS SUCH AS THE NEW YORK TIMES.
Bush Country - a must-read! (excerpt)
Monday, May 23, 2005 By: Fouad Ajami
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"George W. Bush has unleashed a tsunami on this region," a shrewd Kuwaiti merchant who knows the way of his world said to me. The man had no patience with the standard refrain that Arab reform had to come from within, that a foreign power cannot alter the age-old ways of the Arabs. "Everything here--the borders of these states, the oil explorations that remade the life of this world, the political outcomes that favored the elites now in the saddle--came from the outside. This moment of possibility for the Arabs is no exception." A Jordanian of deep political experience at the highest reaches of Arab political life had no doubt as to why history suddenly broke in Lebanon, and could conceivably change in Syria itself before long. "The people in the streets of Beirut knew that no second Hama is possible; they knew that the rulers were under the gaze of American power, and knew that Bush would not permit a massive crackdown by the men in Damascus."
My informant's reference to Hama was telling: It had been there in 1982, in that city of the Syrian interior, that the Baathist-Alawite regime had broken and overwhelmed Syrian society...
CLICK ON THE POST TITLE TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE THAT YOU WILL NOT FIND IN THE MAINSTREAM PRESS SUCH AS THE NEW YORK TIMES.
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
MY VIEWS ON STEM CELL RESEARCH.
This is for one of my readers.
Lauren,
On the issue of stem cell research, I must honestly tell you that I am firmly AGAINST "Embryonic Stem Cell Research" Any kind of research that requires the use of cells harvested from human embryos is to me considered murderous and inhuman. Human embryos are meant to be living, breathing human beings, not replacements for lab rats!
Use of stem cells from other sources, such as those harvested from an umbylical cord of a baby that was from a live delivery and donated by the parents of that child, then I'm all for it, and even adult stem cells.
Research on adult stem cells has recently generated a great deal of excitement. Scientists have found adult stem cells in many more tissues than they once thought possible. This finding has led scientists to ask whether adult stem cells could be used for transplants. In fact, adult blood forming stem cells from bone marrow have been used in transplants for 30 years. Certain kinds of adult stem cells seem to have the ability to differentiate into a number of different cell types, given the right conditions. If this differentiation of adult stem cells can be controlled in the laboratory, these cells may become the basis of therapies for many serious common diseases.
Other then advancing the agenda of death and abortion, that the wacko liberal socialist Democrats love so much, I see no other reason to pursue this research that turns humans into research animals.
It often disturbs me how the enviromentalist tree hugging freaks of nature that support the Marxists like Democrats, are pro life when it comes to animals and trees, but become rabid animals in their support for the killing of human babies on demand.
The enviromental facists of this country are in bed with the G-dless faces of the Marxist like Democratic Party. Take away G-d so that they can advance their agenda of living without morals, and laws thus trying to make themselves, "G-d like".
Research involving Human lives......The Rogue Jew says, "HELL NO!"
Lauren,
On the issue of stem cell research, I must honestly tell you that I am firmly AGAINST "Embryonic Stem Cell Research" Any kind of research that requires the use of cells harvested from human embryos is to me considered murderous and inhuman. Human embryos are meant to be living, breathing human beings, not replacements for lab rats!
Use of stem cells from other sources, such as those harvested from an umbylical cord of a baby that was from a live delivery and donated by the parents of that child, then I'm all for it, and even adult stem cells.
Research on adult stem cells has recently generated a great deal of excitement. Scientists have found adult stem cells in many more tissues than they once thought possible. This finding has led scientists to ask whether adult stem cells could be used for transplants. In fact, adult blood forming stem cells from bone marrow have been used in transplants for 30 years. Certain kinds of adult stem cells seem to have the ability to differentiate into a number of different cell types, given the right conditions. If this differentiation of adult stem cells can be controlled in the laboratory, these cells may become the basis of therapies for many serious common diseases.
Other then advancing the agenda of death and abortion, that the wacko liberal socialist Democrats love so much, I see no other reason to pursue this research that turns humans into research animals.
It often disturbs me how the enviromentalist tree hugging freaks of nature that support the Marxists like Democrats, are pro life when it comes to animals and trees, but become rabid animals in their support for the killing of human babies on demand.
The enviromental facists of this country are in bed with the G-dless faces of the Marxist like Democratic Party. Take away G-d so that they can advance their agenda of living without morals, and laws thus trying to make themselves, "G-d like".
Research involving Human lives......The Rogue Jew says, "HELL NO!"
MESSAGE TO SEN. HITLARY CLINTON...."HELL NO!"
DO WE WANT ANOTHER 8 YEARS OF SCANDAL AND
TERROR INSECURITY IN OUR NATION? I PRAY NOT!
THE ONLY WAY I EVER WANT HITLARY TO EVER SEE
THE INSIDE OF THE WHITEHOUSE AGAIN, IS AS A PAYING
TOURIST! SEND A MESSAGE TO THE FORMER FIRST FELON
AND TELL HER AND BJ BILL "HELL NO!" IN 2008.
THE ROGUE JEW
WIN AT ALL COST!
What kind of civilized people call for the destruction of an entire nation? What value on life do you have when you call for payment in the form of a person's blood?
It was reported in this former industrial town north of London, a small group of young Britons whose parents emigrated from Pakistan after World War II have turned against their families' new home. They say they would like to see Prime Minister Tony Blair dead or deposed and an Islamic flag hanging outside No. 10 Downing Street.
They swear allegiance to Osama bin Laden and his goal of toppling Western democracies to establish an Islamic superstate under Shariah law, like Afghanistan under the Taliban. They call the Sept. 11 hijackers the "Magnificent 19" and regard the Madrid train bombings as a clever way to drive a wedge into Europe.
In Slough, Sheik Omar spends much of his time regaling his young followers with the erotic delights of paradise — sweet kisses and the pleasures of bathing with scores of women — while he also preached the virtues of death in Islamic struggle as a ticket to paradise.
He spoke of terrorism as the new norm of cultural conflict, "the fashion of the 21st century," practiced as much by Tony Blair as by Al Qaeda.
"We may be caught up in the target as the people of Manhattan were," he told them.
And he warned Western leaders, "You may kill bin Laden, but the phenomenon, you cannot kill it — you cannot destroy it."
"Our Muslim brothers from abroad will come one day and conquer here and then we will live under Islam in dignity," he said.
These monsters....YES, I SAID MONSTERS! Want to inflict their prehistoric way of life on us here in America. Their notion of a good life is living in some g-d forsaken cave and killing ones self so that you can enjoy 72 virgins in heaven...I could be wrong, but 72 virgins in a country like Syria usually consists of ugly sheep!
The only way we will win this war against these schmucks is to bomb them into oblivion. If they ever attack us again, I think that the United States Military, G-d Bless our boys and girls, should turn Mecca into a smoking pile of rubble. Hit the bastards where they live!
They desecrate Jewish and Christian icons every day, yet these "civililized" religious zealots, RIOT when a Q'uaran is supposedly flushed down a toilet.
If I were Tony Blair, I would have these clerics arrested, tried for treason and EXECUTED! Then bury the bastards inside of the belly of a dead pig! Same goes if a Islamofacist cleric ever makes a speech here in the United States calling for Jihad and the death of our president. Arrest them, try them in a military court and you KILL THEM! If you want to defeat these animals, then you have to get down in the mud and play by their rules.
That is just my opinion...I could be wrong, but I doubt it......The Rogue Jew
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
HITLARY TORPEDOED OUT OF THE WATER WITH NEW TELL ALL BOOK TO BE RELEASED EARLY!
THIS JUST IN FROM NEWSMAX.COM AND DRUDGEREPORT.COM. THIS BOOK WILL BE A MUST HAVE IN MY LIBRARY!
A reporter at NewsMax.com has learned that a new book about Hillary Clinton is being rushed into print months ahead of schedule and Vanity Fair magazine will soon publish an excerpt of the work.
Publishing insiders say the book and its revelations could destroy her bid to run for the presidency in 2008.
The tell-all book by Edward Klein, "The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President," was originally slated for publication in September.
Click on post title to read this article from NewMax.com!
A reporter at NewsMax.com has learned that a new book about Hillary Clinton is being rushed into print months ahead of schedule and Vanity Fair magazine will soon publish an excerpt of the work.
Publishing insiders say the book and its revelations could destroy her bid to run for the presidency in 2008.
The tell-all book by Edward Klein, "The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President," was originally slated for publication in September.
Click on post title to read this article from NewMax.com!
DEMOCRATS ONLY HOPE IS TO KEEP BLACK VOTERS IN FEAR BY KEEPING RACISM ALIVE!
CLICK ON THE POST TITLE TO READ THIS INTRIGUING ARTICLE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS KEEPING FEAR OF RACISM ALIVE!
Monday, May 23, 2005
HOWARD DEAN FUMBLES THE BALL AGAIN!
Did anyone see Howard "The Scream" Dean get annihalated by Tim Russert on Sunday morning? Wow! I have to take my kippa off to Russert, he blew Dean right out of the water. It kind of reminded me of the old Bill O'Rielly. Dean also came to his own defense and courting the bible belt voters by declaring himself to be a "Committed Christian." After listening and reading about the Dean interview over the weekend, I came to my own conclusion that maybe Howard Dean isn't a "Committed Christian", he is more of a person who "Needs to be committed BY christians".
This yutz is really over the top when he declares that Tom Delay should be sitting in a jail cell in the state of Texas, but in the same breath DEFENDS Osama bin Laden.
Asked by NBC host Tim Russert if his rhetoric toward DeLay wasn't hypocritical given his comments during the 2004 presidential campaign, where Dean said he didn't want to prejudge even Osama bin Laden, the top Democrat told Russert: "To be honest with you, Tim, I don't think I'm prejudging him."
"So you will not retract or apologize your comments about Tom DeLay?" asked Russert.
"Absolutely not," said Dean.
Dean was asked about his recent comments characterizing Republicans as "evil." He explained that the party has told the American people lies.
Asked to talk about those lies, Dean said: "Such as the weapons of mass destruction, which we have all known about, but the ... "
"Well, you said there were weapons of mass destruction," said Russert.
"I said I wasn't sure, but I said I thought there probably were," Dean explained. "But the thing that really bothered me the most, which the 9-11 Commission said also wasn't true, is the insinuation that the president continues to make to this day that Osama bin Laden had something to do with supporting terrorists that attacked the United States. That is false. The 9-11 Commission, chaired by a Republican, said it was false. Is it wrong to send people to war without telling them the truth. And the truth was Osama bin Laden was a very bad person who was doing terrible things, but that Iraq was never a threat to the United States. That was the truth. It was underlined by the 9-11 Commission, headed, again, by a Republican, a well-respected group of people. I don't think you send American men and women to war, first of all without properly equipping them, and secondly without telling the truth to their parents about why it is we're asking them to make that sacrifice. So those are the kinds of things that I think are very bad about the Republicans."
Personally, I feel that Howard Dean as the leader of the DNC, is the best thing that could ever happen to the Republicans and the Conservative agenda. I don't think you get any further left then Howard Dean and his co-concipiritors Ted "hic" Kennedy and John F. Kerry. They are trying to head off an attack by the former President Bill "Blow Job" Clinton and his first felon wife, Sen. Hitlary Clinton to try to make it appear that they are steering the party to the moderate center. But as any educated person would be able to tell that they're is nothing moderate about the Clintons. They are as socialist as they come. They just are not up front and honest about it like Dean and Co. are. But then again, when have we ever known the Clintons to be honest about anything, ever in their lives or careers.
This yutz is really over the top when he declares that Tom Delay should be sitting in a jail cell in the state of Texas, but in the same breath DEFENDS Osama bin Laden.
Asked by NBC host Tim Russert if his rhetoric toward DeLay wasn't hypocritical given his comments during the 2004 presidential campaign, where Dean said he didn't want to prejudge even Osama bin Laden, the top Democrat told Russert: "To be honest with you, Tim, I don't think I'm prejudging him."
"So you will not retract or apologize your comments about Tom DeLay?" asked Russert.
"Absolutely not," said Dean.
Dean was asked about his recent comments characterizing Republicans as "evil." He explained that the party has told the American people lies.
Asked to talk about those lies, Dean said: "Such as the weapons of mass destruction, which we have all known about, but the ... "
"Well, you said there were weapons of mass destruction," said Russert.
"I said I wasn't sure, but I said I thought there probably were," Dean explained. "But the thing that really bothered me the most, which the 9-11 Commission said also wasn't true, is the insinuation that the president continues to make to this day that Osama bin Laden had something to do with supporting terrorists that attacked the United States. That is false. The 9-11 Commission, chaired by a Republican, said it was false. Is it wrong to send people to war without telling them the truth. And the truth was Osama bin Laden was a very bad person who was doing terrible things, but that Iraq was never a threat to the United States. That was the truth. It was underlined by the 9-11 Commission, headed, again, by a Republican, a well-respected group of people. I don't think you send American men and women to war, first of all without properly equipping them, and secondly without telling the truth to their parents about why it is we're asking them to make that sacrifice. So those are the kinds of things that I think are very bad about the Republicans."
Personally, I feel that Howard Dean as the leader of the DNC, is the best thing that could ever happen to the Republicans and the Conservative agenda. I don't think you get any further left then Howard Dean and his co-concipiritors Ted "hic" Kennedy and John F. Kerry. They are trying to head off an attack by the former President Bill "Blow Job" Clinton and his first felon wife, Sen. Hitlary Clinton to try to make it appear that they are steering the party to the moderate center. But as any educated person would be able to tell that they're is nothing moderate about the Clintons. They are as socialist as they come. They just are not up front and honest about it like Dean and Co. are. But then again, when have we ever known the Clintons to be honest about anything, ever in their lives or careers.
Sunday, May 22, 2005
MORE FROM ANN COULTER
"Conservatives believe man was created in God's image, while liberals believe they are gods. All of the behavioral tics of the liberals proceed from their godless belief that they can murder the unborn because they, the liberals, are themselves gods. They try to forcibly create 'equality' through affirmative action and wealth redistribution because they are gods. They flat-out lie, with no higher power to constrain them, because they are gods. They adore pornography and the mechanization of sex because man is just an animal, and they are gods. They revere the UN and not the U.S. because they aren't Americans -- they are gods."
"Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now." - Talking Ann Coulter doll, Conservative Book Service
"We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. ¶ We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war." - from her syndicated column 13 September, 2001
On the values of Christianity vs. the values of Islam:
"Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed')". - from her column (at townhall.com) 4 March, 2004
On women:
"I think [women] should be armed but should not vote...women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it...it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care." - Politically Incorrect, February 26, 2001
"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted." - May 17, 2003.
"Like the Democrats, Playboy just wants to liberate women to behave like pigs, have sex without consequences, prance about naked, and abort children." - How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), 2004
On a pie throwing incident against her in October, 2004
"A couple [of] alleged males attempted to sucker punch a 100-pound woman and missed. And they ended up with their faces smashed in and spending the night in the w:Pima County Jail, where I'm sure -- being good liberals -- their views on gay marriage will serve them well." from w:The Sean Hannity Show, October 22, 2004.
I LOVE ANN COULTER. LATER THIS WEEK, I WILL DISCUSS STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION.....THE ROGUE JEW
"Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now." - Talking Ann Coulter doll, Conservative Book Service
"We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. ¶ We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war." - from her syndicated column 13 September, 2001
On the values of Christianity vs. the values of Islam:
"Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed')". - from her column (at townhall.com) 4 March, 2004
On women:
"I think [women] should be armed but should not vote...women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it...it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care." - Politically Incorrect, February 26, 2001
"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted." - May 17, 2003.
"Like the Democrats, Playboy just wants to liberate women to behave like pigs, have sex without consequences, prance about naked, and abort children." - How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), 2004
On a pie throwing incident against her in October, 2004
"A couple [of] alleged males attempted to sucker punch a 100-pound woman and missed. And they ended up with their faces smashed in and spending the night in the w:Pima County Jail, where I'm sure -- being good liberals -- their views on gay marriage will serve them well." from w:The Sean Hannity Show, October 22, 2004.
I LOVE ANN COULTER. LATER THIS WEEK, I WILL DISCUSS STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION.....THE ROGUE JEW
Thursday, May 19, 2005
How Bad Science Helped Launch the 'Gay' Revolution
How Bad Science Helped Launch the 'Gay' Revolution 9/18/2002
By Robert H. Knight
Kinsey’s 10% figure has created a false "minority" group in the public mind
Franklin Kameny of Washington, D.C., is often described as the "dean" of homosexual activists. Mr. Kameny claims to have coined the term "gay is good," and was instrumental in having D.C.’s sodomy law repealed.
Recently, he made an amazing statement regarding one of the totems of the sexual revolution, the claim that one in every 10 people is "gay." Here’s his quote, from a letter in the September 6, 2002, Washington Blade:
"I personally created the ‘10 percent figure’ in late 1960 for use in my position to the U.S. Supreme Court, in my own case. The figure was based upon a reasonable and plausible, intentionally conservative and understated interpretation of the Kinsey data, which were the only statistics then available.
"The 10 percent figure subsequently achieved a life of its own, and was universally accepted and used. Whatever its initial accuracy, I am convinced it is much closer to reality than the ridiculously low figure of 1 or 2 percent, derived from highly questionable and unreliable research."
Mr. Kameny is right about the way the 10 percent myth was used. Journalists, lawyers and educators began citing it without a hint of skepticism. The result was the creation in the public mind of a false "minority" group that began to co-opt the moral capital of the civil rights movement. It didn’t matter that it was all based on bad science.
Alfred C. Kinsey’s research, which helped launch the sexual revolution, was utterly exposed in Dr. Judith Reisman’s and Edward Eichel’s 1990 book Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People (Huntington House-Lochinvar). The British medical journal Lancet said the authors "demolish the two [Kinsey] reports."
Kinsey deliberately weighted his samples with homosexuals, convicted criminals and other unorthodox subjects. The authors also expose how Kinsey used children in sex studies to concoct a theory of "child sexuality" that is the guiding force today behind sex education curricula promoted by Planned Parenthood and the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).
Studies published by the University of Chicago, Family Planning Perspectives, the British Medical Journal, the National Health Interview Survey of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, and many others indicate an incidence of homosexuality of 1 to 2 percent in Western countries.
Although the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Science, initially supported the Kinsey research in the late 1940s and early 1950s, a reassessment emerged in 1989. Here is an excerpt from AIDS: Sexual Behavior and Intravenous Drug Use, edited by Charles F. Turner, Heather G. Miller, and Lincoln E. Moses (National Academy Press, National Research Council, 1989), p. 82:
"It has long been recognized that one of the greatest faults of the Kinsey research was the way in which the cases were selected; the sample is not representative of the entire U.S. population or of any definable group in the population. This fault limits the comparability and appropriateness of the Kinsey data as a basis for calculating the prevalence of any form of sexual conduct."
The book also notes that Kinsey’s agenda for sexual liberation tainted his research: "The very claim for the legitimacy of science in the area of sexuality was an attempt to change the ‘rules of the game’ that defined what conduct was normal and what was abnormal.
"Kinsey went even further, however. He attempted to counter the traditional religious view that sexual virtue was entirely composed of heterosexual activity in the pursuit of reproduction inside the bonds of marriage, as well as the orthodox psychoanalytic revision of this traditional view, which admitted the existence of other forms of sexual expression but treated them as either perversions from or preludes to the sexual ‘normality’ found in mature heterosexual committed relationships." (p. 86)
In 1997, in his book Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life, biographer James H. Jones revealed Kinsey’s prodigious appetite for sadistic varieties of homosexual sex, voyeurism and other perversions, and how they inspired his social agenda:
"The man I came to know bore no resemblance to the canonical Kinsey. Anything but disinterested, he approached his work with missionary fervor. Kinsey loathed Victorian morality. … He was determined to use science to strip human sexuality of its guilt and repression. He wanted to undermine traditional morality, to soften the rules of restraint. …Kinsey was a crypto-reformer who spent his every waking hour attempting to change the sexual mores and sex offender laws of the United States." (p. xii)
Based on his own imagination, Kinsey created his famous 7-point Kinsey scale of sexuality, with heterosexuality at 0 and homosexuality at 6 (bisexuality being a "balanced" score at 3.5). He drew a line from 0 upward and rightward to make a perfect diagonal, as if human sexuality could be precisely and geometrically charted. This entirely fabricated "scientific" scale has been used in sex education books, court cases and legislative hearings to contend that homosexuality and bisexuality are normative. Kinsey concocted the scale even before he had done any substantial interviewing of data subjects, according to his co-author, Wardell Pomeroy.
Dr. Reisman, who has pursued the Kinsey myth for three decades, authored another book in 1998, showing how Kinsey’s research became the foundation for America’s sexual revolution. In Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences (First Principles Press, 1998, 2000), she also chronicled how Kinsey and his disciples systematically weakened America’s sex offender laws by inserting the fraudulent Kinsey data into cases, law review articles, and presentations before state legislatures.
Kinsey’s legacy in the form of a cultural blitzkrieg against sexual restraint – and therefore against marriage and family — has been enormous. He just might be the most influential fraud in American social history.
As far as "gay" activist Franklin Kameny’s boast of using the Kinsey research as his lodestar, it’s a welcome and revealing confession, although it is doubtful that Mr. Kameny would see it that way.
Robert Knight is the director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America. Knight wrote and directed The Children of Table 34, a Family Research Council video documentary about Alfred Kinsey.
By Robert H. Knight
Kinsey’s 10% figure has created a false "minority" group in the public mind
Franklin Kameny of Washington, D.C., is often described as the "dean" of homosexual activists. Mr. Kameny claims to have coined the term "gay is good," and was instrumental in having D.C.’s sodomy law repealed.
Recently, he made an amazing statement regarding one of the totems of the sexual revolution, the claim that one in every 10 people is "gay." Here’s his quote, from a letter in the September 6, 2002, Washington Blade:
"I personally created the ‘10 percent figure’ in late 1960 for use in my position to the U.S. Supreme Court, in my own case. The figure was based upon a reasonable and plausible, intentionally conservative and understated interpretation of the Kinsey data, which were the only statistics then available.
"The 10 percent figure subsequently achieved a life of its own, and was universally accepted and used. Whatever its initial accuracy, I am convinced it is much closer to reality than the ridiculously low figure of 1 or 2 percent, derived from highly questionable and unreliable research."
Mr. Kameny is right about the way the 10 percent myth was used. Journalists, lawyers and educators began citing it without a hint of skepticism. The result was the creation in the public mind of a false "minority" group that began to co-opt the moral capital of the civil rights movement. It didn’t matter that it was all based on bad science.
Alfred C. Kinsey’s research, which helped launch the sexual revolution, was utterly exposed in Dr. Judith Reisman’s and Edward Eichel’s 1990 book Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People (Huntington House-Lochinvar). The British medical journal Lancet said the authors "demolish the two [Kinsey] reports."
Kinsey deliberately weighted his samples with homosexuals, convicted criminals and other unorthodox subjects. The authors also expose how Kinsey used children in sex studies to concoct a theory of "child sexuality" that is the guiding force today behind sex education curricula promoted by Planned Parenthood and the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).
Studies published by the University of Chicago, Family Planning Perspectives, the British Medical Journal, the National Health Interview Survey of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, and many others indicate an incidence of homosexuality of 1 to 2 percent in Western countries.
Although the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Science, initially supported the Kinsey research in the late 1940s and early 1950s, a reassessment emerged in 1989. Here is an excerpt from AIDS: Sexual Behavior and Intravenous Drug Use, edited by Charles F. Turner, Heather G. Miller, and Lincoln E. Moses (National Academy Press, National Research Council, 1989), p. 82:
"It has long been recognized that one of the greatest faults of the Kinsey research was the way in which the cases were selected; the sample is not representative of the entire U.S. population or of any definable group in the population. This fault limits the comparability and appropriateness of the Kinsey data as a basis for calculating the prevalence of any form of sexual conduct."
The book also notes that Kinsey’s agenda for sexual liberation tainted his research: "The very claim for the legitimacy of science in the area of sexuality was an attempt to change the ‘rules of the game’ that defined what conduct was normal and what was abnormal.
"Kinsey went even further, however. He attempted to counter the traditional religious view that sexual virtue was entirely composed of heterosexual activity in the pursuit of reproduction inside the bonds of marriage, as well as the orthodox psychoanalytic revision of this traditional view, which admitted the existence of other forms of sexual expression but treated them as either perversions from or preludes to the sexual ‘normality’ found in mature heterosexual committed relationships." (p. 86)
In 1997, in his book Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life, biographer James H. Jones revealed Kinsey’s prodigious appetite for sadistic varieties of homosexual sex, voyeurism and other perversions, and how they inspired his social agenda:
"The man I came to know bore no resemblance to the canonical Kinsey. Anything but disinterested, he approached his work with missionary fervor. Kinsey loathed Victorian morality. … He was determined to use science to strip human sexuality of its guilt and repression. He wanted to undermine traditional morality, to soften the rules of restraint. …Kinsey was a crypto-reformer who spent his every waking hour attempting to change the sexual mores and sex offender laws of the United States." (p. xii)
Based on his own imagination, Kinsey created his famous 7-point Kinsey scale of sexuality, with heterosexuality at 0 and homosexuality at 6 (bisexuality being a "balanced" score at 3.5). He drew a line from 0 upward and rightward to make a perfect diagonal, as if human sexuality could be precisely and geometrically charted. This entirely fabricated "scientific" scale has been used in sex education books, court cases and legislative hearings to contend that homosexuality and bisexuality are normative. Kinsey concocted the scale even before he had done any substantial interviewing of data subjects, according to his co-author, Wardell Pomeroy.
Dr. Reisman, who has pursued the Kinsey myth for three decades, authored another book in 1998, showing how Kinsey’s research became the foundation for America’s sexual revolution. In Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences (First Principles Press, 1998, 2000), she also chronicled how Kinsey and his disciples systematically weakened America’s sex offender laws by inserting the fraudulent Kinsey data into cases, law review articles, and presentations before state legislatures.
Kinsey’s legacy in the form of a cultural blitzkrieg against sexual restraint – and therefore against marriage and family — has been enormous. He just might be the most influential fraud in American social history.
As far as "gay" activist Franklin Kameny’s boast of using the Kinsey research as his lodestar, it’s a welcome and revealing confession, although it is doubtful that Mr. Kameny would see it that way.
Robert Knight is the director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America. Knight wrote and directed The Children of Table 34, a Family Research Council video documentary about Alfred Kinsey.
NEWSWEEK DISSEMBLED-MUSLIMS DISMEMBERED
ANOTHER FACINATING COMMENTARY BY ANN COULTER. CLICK ON POST TITLE TO READ THIS STORY!
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
THE DAY MICHAEL JACKSON SAID HE COULD SAVE HITLER
CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THIS EXCLUSIVE COMMENTARY POSTED ON WORLDNETDAILY.COM BY RABBI SCHMULEY BOTEACH ABOUT THE MESSIAH COMPLEXES THAT HOLLYWEIRD CELEBS HAVE.
OFFICIAL PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY SERMON: MUSLIMS WILL RULE AMERICA!
Official PA sermon: Muslims will rule America
Government-paid sheik says Jews a virus to be destroyed!
CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THIS STORY POSTED ON WORLDNETDAILY.COM
Government-paid sheik says Jews a virus to be destroyed!
CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THIS STORY POSTED ON WORLDNETDAILY.COM
PALESTINIANS USED THE BIBLE AS TOILET PAPER
FLUSH TO JUDGMENT
Palestinians used Bible as toilet paper: Muslims' desecration of holy book received little notice from liberal socialist mainstream press.
CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THIS STORY!
Palestinians used Bible as toilet paper: Muslims' desecration of holy book received little notice from liberal socialist mainstream press.
CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THIS STORY!
HOWARD "THE SCREAM" DEAN SHOOTS FROM THE LIP ONCE AGAIN
One must question the sanity and the mental abilities of the Democratic party leadership, particularly it's new lunitic in charge, Howard Dean.
He continues to say that Osama bin Laden is innocent until proven guilty, but that Senator Tom Delay should go to jail.
Even some of Delay's biggest critics are stepping back from what Howard "The Scream" Dean is saying, even the homosexual members of Congress.
Fellow Democrat Barney Frank, a liberal Massachusetts congressman, said Monday on television that he considered the comment "very unfair."
"I think it was inappropriate," Frank said. "I'm a great critic of Tom DeLay's . . . but to say that he's a criminal, at this point there's no basis for that."
Senator Delay has not even been brought up on any criminal charges, but Democrat Leader is quick to shoot off his big mouth saying that "Tom Delay should go back to Texas to serve his jail sentence." while defending Terrorist Leader and murderous Islamofacist Osama bin Laden.
He continues to say that Osama bin Laden is innocent until proven guilty, but that Senator Tom Delay should go to jail.
Even some of Delay's biggest critics are stepping back from what Howard "The Scream" Dean is saying, even the homosexual members of Congress.
Fellow Democrat Barney Frank, a liberal Massachusetts congressman, said Monday on television that he considered the comment "very unfair."
"I think it was inappropriate," Frank said. "I'm a great critic of Tom DeLay's . . . but to say that he's a criminal, at this point there's no basis for that."
Senator Delay has not even been brought up on any criminal charges, but Democrat Leader is quick to shoot off his big mouth saying that "Tom Delay should go back to Texas to serve his jail sentence." while defending Terrorist Leader and murderous Islamofacist Osama bin Laden.
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
THE TRUTH ABOUT DR. ALFRED KINSEY
With the release of the DVD "KINSEY", the story about Dr. Alfred Kinsey I felt abliged to let my readers know that Hollyweird whitewashed this fanatical pedophilic, sadistic, homosexual freak of nature as part of their agenda to pervert the minds of Americans. Here is some interesting facts about Dr. Kinsey that the movie failed to tell:
research reveals that He compiled statistics of “normal” sexual behavior by
including a high percentage of pedophiles, inmates, sex
offenders, pimps and prostitutes and described them as
“average” Americans. He kept no records that could
corroborate his findings.
1. The Kinsey data are the scientific basis for the Model
Penal Code, which led to the elimination or reduction in
penalties for sex offenses, including rape, child abuse and
prostitution.
2. Kinsey’s data are also the basis for most of America’s sex
education curricula, which begin with the premise that
children are “sexual beings” entitled to sex at all ages.
3. He believed that all sexual behaviors were “natural,”
including bestiality, pedophilia, homosexuality, sodomy
and sadistic sex. He argued that sex and morality had no
connection.
4. He collected data on the sexual abuse of hundreds of
infants and children with the purpose of recording
“orgasms.”
5. He believed there was nothing inherently wrong with
child-adult sex except for reactions to it based on
superstitious “taboos.”
6. Kinsey filmed his wife masturbating and having sex with
other staff members and he himself had sex with all of his
male staff.
7. He filmed himself masturbating and performing
masochistic acts on himself. Biographers report that he
may have fatally injured himself during a bizarre
masturbation incident.
1. Kinsey’s “science” was fraudulent and in some cases criminal.
2. Children were sexually molested for the data that Kinsey gathered.
3. An entire sex education industry grew out of Kinsey’s deceptive data.
4. The Kinsey-engineered Model Penal Code resulted in reducing penalties for sex offenses, such as rape and molestation, thus putting women and children at increased risk.
Anyone who thinks that this man was a gift to the sexual world, needs to have their head examined and maybe even consider sterilization. You can be sure that there will be more to follow on this sick perverse bastard in the future.
Sources: James Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (New York: W.W.
Norton & Company, 1997). Dr. Judith A. Reisman, Kinsey: Crimes &
Consequences (Crestwood, Kentucky, 2000). Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and
Edward W. Eichel, Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People
(Lafayette, Louisiana: Lochinvar-Huntington House, 1990).
research reveals that He compiled statistics of “normal” sexual behavior by
including a high percentage of pedophiles, inmates, sex
offenders, pimps and prostitutes and described them as
“average” Americans. He kept no records that could
corroborate his findings.
1. The Kinsey data are the scientific basis for the Model
Penal Code, which led to the elimination or reduction in
penalties for sex offenses, including rape, child abuse and
prostitution.
2. Kinsey’s data are also the basis for most of America’s sex
education curricula, which begin with the premise that
children are “sexual beings” entitled to sex at all ages.
3. He believed that all sexual behaviors were “natural,”
including bestiality, pedophilia, homosexuality, sodomy
and sadistic sex. He argued that sex and morality had no
connection.
4. He collected data on the sexual abuse of hundreds of
infants and children with the purpose of recording
“orgasms.”
5. He believed there was nothing inherently wrong with
child-adult sex except for reactions to it based on
superstitious “taboos.”
6. Kinsey filmed his wife masturbating and having sex with
other staff members and he himself had sex with all of his
male staff.
7. He filmed himself masturbating and performing
masochistic acts on himself. Biographers report that he
may have fatally injured himself during a bizarre
masturbation incident.
1. Kinsey’s “science” was fraudulent and in some cases criminal.
2. Children were sexually molested for the data that Kinsey gathered.
3. An entire sex education industry grew out of Kinsey’s deceptive data.
4. The Kinsey-engineered Model Penal Code resulted in reducing penalties for sex offenses, such as rape and molestation, thus putting women and children at increased risk.
Anyone who thinks that this man was a gift to the sexual world, needs to have their head examined and maybe even consider sterilization. You can be sure that there will be more to follow on this sick perverse bastard in the future.
Sources: James Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (New York: W.W.
Norton & Company, 1997). Dr. Judith A. Reisman, Kinsey: Crimes &
Consequences (Crestwood, Kentucky, 2000). Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and
Edward W. Eichel, Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People
(Lafayette, Louisiana: Lochinvar-Huntington House, 1990).
ISLAMAFACIST DOUBLE STANDARD
I ask one simple question...How come when a Jewish or a Christian holy site is desecrated or vandalized, the press puts it on the back page or noone even says a word about it, but when a falsified story gets out about a koran going down the toilet and the liberal world is up in arms?
I am waiting for the anti-G-d A C L U to come out in full force on this one. They defend murderous blood thirsty IslamoFacicists but spit on the beliefs of Jews and Christians.
Whenever a Jewish cemetary is vandalized, you don't see the Hasidic Jews rampaging in the streets killing Christians and other non Jews. Same goes for when some neo-nazi freak of nature scum bag burns down a Babtist church in the south, you don't see the Christians burning down homes and beheading non-believers...But wait one minute, if a Koran is RUMORED to have been flushed down a toilet, then I guess it's time to let the killing begin. Heads will roll. Jews and Christians alike and all non-believers in Islam. What a double standard there has become, and the liberal media is latching on to the coat tails of the IslamoFacists and riding rough shod over Jews and Christians.
I just cannot wait to see what the liberal media will do next to lie, cheat and steal their way into making President Bush and all Americans look bad in the eyes of the world.
I am waiting for the anti-G-d A C L U to come out in full force on this one. They defend murderous blood thirsty IslamoFacicists but spit on the beliefs of Jews and Christians.
Whenever a Jewish cemetary is vandalized, you don't see the Hasidic Jews rampaging in the streets killing Christians and other non Jews. Same goes for when some neo-nazi freak of nature scum bag burns down a Babtist church in the south, you don't see the Christians burning down homes and beheading non-believers...But wait one minute, if a Koran is RUMORED to have been flushed down a toilet, then I guess it's time to let the killing begin. Heads will roll. Jews and Christians alike and all non-believers in Islam. What a double standard there has become, and the liberal media is latching on to the coat tails of the IslamoFacists and riding rough shod over Jews and Christians.
I just cannot wait to see what the liberal media will do next to lie, cheat and steal their way into making President Bush and all Americans look bad in the eyes of the world.
MOORE LIES-The Saga Continues...
Edward Jay Epstein, Hollywood industry guru and author of "The Big Picture: The New Logic of Money and Power in Hollywood," explains that despite news stories claiming that Michael Moore was a victim of Disney censorship with regard to his "Fahrenheit 9/11" flick, both Moore and Disney raked in a bundle of bucks.
According to Epstein, Moore manipulated the press in Madonna-like manner, faking a censorship threat to get cheap P.R.
In May 2003, Michael Eisner, then CEO of Disney, exercised his right under an agreement with Miramax to veto Disney distribution. But Miramax, a Disney subsidiary, still held the rights to the film.
Head of Miramax Harvey Weinstein planned to sell the distribution rights to "Fahrenheit 9/11" after it was screened at the Cannes Film Festival.
On the eve of Cannes and seemingly right on cue, a front-page article appeared in the New York Times. The headline read: "Disney Is Blocking Distribution of Film That Criticizes Bush."
The piece claimed that Eisner's action in keeping Disney out of the distribution loop was motivated by concerns that Disney could potentially lose tax breaks in Florida, "where Mr. Bush's brother, Jeb, is governor."
A couple of days after the Times article appeared, Moore did a Web site post that indicated Disney's board of directors had passed on the film "last week."
But the Disney board had done no such thing. The flick had been vetoed by Eisner the previous year.
Eisner retained the rights to profit on Moore's film but wanted Disney to maintain its distance. So Miramax sold the "Fahrenheit 9/11" rights to the Weinstein brothers, who then transferred the rights to another entity called Fellowship Adventure Group. In the process, the brothers were able to arrange some very favorable distribution deals.
In the end, Disney netted $78 million and paid Moore a hefty $21 million.
Moore never disclosed the amount of his profit participation. When asked about it, he told reporters, "I don't read the contracts."
The Rogue Jew heard that Moore was so mad about the news that blemished his workingman image, he punched a hole in the wall of the servants' quarters.
According to Epstein, Moore manipulated the press in Madonna-like manner, faking a censorship threat to get cheap P.R.
In May 2003, Michael Eisner, then CEO of Disney, exercised his right under an agreement with Miramax to veto Disney distribution. But Miramax, a Disney subsidiary, still held the rights to the film.
Head of Miramax Harvey Weinstein planned to sell the distribution rights to "Fahrenheit 9/11" after it was screened at the Cannes Film Festival.
On the eve of Cannes and seemingly right on cue, a front-page article appeared in the New York Times. The headline read: "Disney Is Blocking Distribution of Film That Criticizes Bush."
The piece claimed that Eisner's action in keeping Disney out of the distribution loop was motivated by concerns that Disney could potentially lose tax breaks in Florida, "where Mr. Bush's brother, Jeb, is governor."
A couple of days after the Times article appeared, Moore did a Web site post that indicated Disney's board of directors had passed on the film "last week."
But the Disney board had done no such thing. The flick had been vetoed by Eisner the previous year.
Eisner retained the rights to profit on Moore's film but wanted Disney to maintain its distance. So Miramax sold the "Fahrenheit 9/11" rights to the Weinstein brothers, who then transferred the rights to another entity called Fellowship Adventure Group. In the process, the brothers were able to arrange some very favorable distribution deals.
In the end, Disney netted $78 million and paid Moore a hefty $21 million.
Moore never disclosed the amount of his profit participation. When asked about it, he told reporters, "I don't read the contracts."
The Rogue Jew heard that Moore was so mad about the news that blemished his workingman image, he punched a hole in the wall of the servants' quarters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)